-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove the old copy propagation pass #77373
Conversation
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
You'll probably know better than me who a good reviewer here is - I don't have sufficient context I think, so I'll let you reassign. |
r? @oli-obk |
@@ -472,7 +471,6 @@ fn run_optimization_passes<'tcx>( | |||
&simplify_try::SimplifyArmIdentity, | |||
&simplify_try::SimplifyBranchSame, | |||
&dest_prop::DestinationPropagation, | |||
©_prop::CopyPropagation, | |||
&simplify_branches::SimplifyBranches::new("after-copy-prop"), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this should probably be renamed
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Renamed to "final"
@@ -1,39 +0,0 @@ | |||
// Check that CopyPropagation does not propagate an assignment to a function argument |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we have tests for all of these situations for the dest-prop opt?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I ported this test over, the results look correct
lgtm. r=me with nits resolved |
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
Awaiting bors try build completion |
⌛ Trying commit 8aa1239de1c8daab86d44fdd93b5ed1f91369136 with merge f60f56e913fc86e229f05dff68d2853916dbf706... |
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions, checks-azure |
Queued f60f56e913fc86e229f05dff68d2853916dbf706 with parent 3bbc443, future comparison URL. |
Finished benchmarking try commit (f60f56e913fc86e229f05dff68d2853916dbf706): comparison url. Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. Please note that if the perf results are neutral, you should likely undo the rollup=never given below by specifying Importantly, though, if the results of this run are non-neutral do not roll this PR up -- it will mask other regressions or improvements in the roll up. @bors rollup=never |
@bors rollup- |
(the pass doesn't run by default, so there's no perf impact) |
@jonas-schievink Could you resolve the merge conflicts? |
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit dc31777 has been approved by |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions, checks-azure |
This pass was added a long time ago, and has not really seen much improvement since (apart from some great work in #76569 that unfortunately ran into preexisting soundness issues). It is slow and unsound, and we now have a destination propagation pass that performs a related optimization and could be extended.
Closes #36673
Closes #73717
Closes #76740