Implement const expressions and patterns (RFC 2920) #77124

spastorino · 2020-09-23T21:43:21Z

cc @ecstatic-morse @lcnr @oli-obk @petrochenkov

rust-highfive · 2020-09-23T21:43:25Z

r? @oli-obk

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/pat.rs

compiler/rustc_ast/src/ast.rs

lcnr

I would personally somewhat strongly prefer a different expression name here, for example InlineConst. AnonConst is already in use to describe all unnamed constants (array lengths etc) of which
these expressions are only a subset.

[u8; 3 + 4]
    ^^^^^^
StructFoo<{3 + 7}>
           ^^^^^^

Apart from this I think these changes look good

src/test/ui/parser/keyword-const-as-identifier.rs

compiler/rustc_ast/src/ast.rs

src/test/ui/parser/keyword-const-as-identifier.rs

compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/mod.rs

compiler/rustc_ast_pretty/src/pprust.rs

compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/stmt.rs

compiler/rustc_typeck/src/check/expr.rs

compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/build/expr/category.rs

compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/build/expr/as_rvalue.rs

compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/mod.rs

src/test/ui/parser/keyword-const-as-identifier.rs

compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/pat.rs

bors · 2020-10-17T14:44:57Z

⌛ Testing commit 03321b8 with merge 6af9846...

bors · 2020-10-17T16:57:12Z

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions, checks-azure
Approved by: oli-obk
Pushing 6af9846 to master...

leonardo-m · 2020-10-18T08:31:26Z

I've tried:

#![allow(incomplete_features)]
#![feature(inline_const)]
fn main() {
    const N: u32 = 10;
    let x: u32 = 3;

    match x {
        1 .. const { N - 1 } => {},
        _ => {},
    }
}

It gave me errors:

error: expected one of `=>`, `if`, or `|`, found keyword `const`
 --> ...\temp.rs:9:14
  |
9 |         1 .. const { N - 1 } => {},
  |              ^^^^^ expected one of `=>`, `if`, or `|`

error[E0658]: half-open range patterns are unstable
 --> ...\temp.rs:9:9
  |
9 |         1 .. const { N - 1 } => {},
  |         ^^^^
  |
  = note: see issue #67264 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/67264> for more information
  = help: add `#![feature(half_open_range_patterns)]` to the crate attributes to enable

jplatte · 2020-10-19T16:55:51Z

@leonardo-m You should probably open a new issue about that.

leonardo-m · 2020-10-19T17:01:18Z

@leonardo-m You should probably open a new issue about that.

OK, filed as #78108

petrochenkov · 2020-10-19T17:57:28Z

compiler/rustc_hir_pretty/src/lib.rs

+        self.s.word_space("const");
+        self.s.word("{");
+        self.print_anon_const(anon_const);
+        self.s.word("}");


Similarly to AST printing, the expr is already a block, printing the braces again shouldn't be necessary.

petrochenkov · 2020-10-19T18:04:05Z

compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/mod.rs

@@ -545,6 +546,11 @@ impl<'a> Parser<'a> {
        self.check_or_expected(self.token.can_begin_const_arg(), TokenType::Const)
    }

+    fn check_inline_const(&mut self) -> bool {
+        self.check_keyword(kw::Const)
+            && self.look_ahead(1, |t| t == &token::OpenDelim(DelimToken::Brace))


token::NtBlock should probably also work as a next token.
(At least it will be successfully parsed by parse_const_expr.)

leonardo-m · 2020-10-19T19:29:01Z

One use case I've found in my code:

let _m = [const { Vec::<u32>::new() }; 40];

Rustc could suggest to write that when a programmer tries to write:

let _m = [vec![]; 40];

@petrochenkov

…r=petrochenkov Inline const followups r? @petrochenkov Follow ups of rust-lang#77124

@petrochenkov

…r=petrochenkov Inline const followups r? @petrochenkov Follow ups of rust-lang#77124

@petrochenkov

…t, r=petrochenkov Make inline const work in range patterns Fixes rust-lang#78108 which is a follow up of rust-lang#77124 r? @petrochenkov

@petrochenkov

…t, r=petrochenkov Make inline const work in range patterns Fixes rust-lang#78108 which is a follow up of rust-lang#77124 r? @petrochenkov

Stabilise inline_const # Stabilisation Report ## Summary This PR will stabilise `inline_const` feature in expression position. `inline_const_pat` is still unstable and will *not* be stabilised. The feature will allow code like this: ```rust foo(const { 1 + 1 }) ``` which is roughly desugared into ```rust struct Foo; impl Foo { const FOO: i32 = 1 + 1; } foo(Foo::FOO) ``` This feature is from rust-lang/rfcs#2920 and is tracked in rust-lang#76001 (the tracking issue should *not* be closed as it needs to track inline const in pattern position). The initial implementation is done in rust-lang#77124. ## Difference from RFC There are two major differences (enhancements) as implemented from the RFC. First thing is that the RFC says that the type of an inline const block inferred from the content *within* it, but we currently can infer the type using the information from outside the const block as well. This is a frequently requested feature to the initial implementation (e.g. rust-lang#89964). The inference is implemented in rust-lang#89561 and is done by treating inline const similar to a closure and therefore share inference context with its parent body. This allows code like: ```rust let v: Vec<i32> = const { Vec::new() }; ``` Another enhancement that differs from the RFC is that we currently allow inline consts to reference generic parameters. This is implemented in rust-lang#96557. This allows code like: ```rust fn create_none_array<T, const N: usize>() -> [Option<T>; N] { [const { None::<T> }; N] } ``` This enhancement also makes inline const usable as static asserts: ```rust fn require_zst<T>() { const { assert!(std::mem::size_of::<T>() == 0) } } ``` ## Documentation Reference: rust-lang/reference#1295 ## Unresolved issues We still have a few issues that are not resolved, but I don't think it necessarily has to block stabilisation: * expr fragment specifier issue: rust-lang#86730 * ~~`const {}` behaves similar to `async {}` but not to `{}` and `unsafe {}` (they are treated as `ExpressionWithoutBlock` rather than `ExpressionWithBlock`): https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/213817-t-lang/topic/const.20blocks.20differ.20from.20normal.20and.20from.20unsafe.20blocks/near/290229453~~ ## Tests There are a few tests in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/tree/master/src/test/ui/inline-const

rust-highfive assigned oli-obk Sep 23, 2020

rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Sep 23, 2020

ecstatic-morse reviewed Sep 23, 2020

View reviewed changes

compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/pat.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

spastorino force-pushed the const-exprs-rfc-2920 branch from 08c9df0 to 18712dd Compare September 23, 2020 22:27

jyn514 reviewed Sep 23, 2020

View reviewed changes

compiler/rustc_ast/src/ast.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

compiler/rustc_ast/src/ast.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

petrochenkov self-assigned this Sep 24, 2020

lcnr approved these changes Sep 24, 2020

View reviewed changes

oli-obk reviewed Sep 24, 2020

View reviewed changes

src/test/ui/parser/keyword-const-as-identifier.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

petrochenkov reviewed Sep 24, 2020

View reviewed changes

petrochenkov removed their assignment Sep 24, 2020

eddyb reviewed Sep 25, 2020

View reviewed changes

compiler/rustc_typeck/src/check/expr.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

eddyb reviewed Sep 25, 2020

View reviewed changes

compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/build/expr/category.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

eddyb reviewed Sep 25, 2020

View reviewed changes

compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/build/expr/as_rvalue.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

spastorino force-pushed the const-exprs-rfc-2920 branch 4 times, most recently from 2ca921d to d56e67b Compare September 29, 2020 02:52

oli-obk reviewed Sep 29, 2020

View reviewed changes

compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/mod.rs Show resolved Hide resolved

src/test/ui/parser/keyword-const-as-identifier.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

lcnr reviewed Oct 2, 2020

View reviewed changes

compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/pat.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

spastorino force-pushed the const-exprs-rfc-2920 branch 6 times, most recently from 39e8252 to 9af38b0 Compare October 6, 2020 21:52

bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Oct 17, 2020

bors mentioned this pull request Oct 17, 2020

Implement destructuring assignment #71156

Closed

bors merged commit 6af9846 into rust-lang:master Oct 17, 2020

rustbot added this to the 1.49.0 milestone Oct 17, 2020

This was referenced Oct 17, 2020

Add #[cfg(panic = '...')] #74754

Merged

Mark repr128 as incomplete_features #77488

Merged

spastorino mentioned this pull request Oct 19, 2020

Tracking Issue for inline const patterns (RFC 2920) #76001

Open

11 tasks

petrochenkov reviewed Oct 19, 2020

View reviewed changes

spastorino mentioned this pull request Oct 19, 2020

Make inline const work in range patterns #78116

Merged

spastorino mentioned this pull request Oct 19, 2020

Inline const followups #78118

Merged

camelid mentioned this pull request Oct 21, 2020

ICE: "cannot convert ReErased to a region vid" for let const { "foo" } = "foo" #78174

Closed

JohnTitor added a commit to JohnTitor/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2020

Rollup merge of rust-lang#78118 - spastorino:inline-const-followups, …

34c2223

…r=petrochenkov Inline const followups r? @petrochenkov Follow ups of rust-lang#77124

JohnTitor added a commit to JohnTitor/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2020

Rollup merge of rust-lang#78118 - spastorino:inline-const-followups, …

de24210

…r=petrochenkov Inline const followups r? @petrochenkov Follow ups of rust-lang#77124

camelid mentioned this pull request Dec 16, 2020

regression 1.49: macro_rules unexpected tokens #79908

Closed

nbdd0121 mentioned this pull request Nov 7, 2022

Stabilise inline_const #104087

Merged

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Implement const expressions and patterns (RFC 2920) #77124

Implement const expressions and patterns (RFC 2920) #77124

spastorino commented Sep 23, 2020 •

edited

Loading

rust-highfive commented Sep 23, 2020

lcnr left a comment

This comment has been minimized.

bors commented Oct 17, 2020

bors commented Oct 17, 2020

leonardo-m commented Oct 18, 2020

jplatte commented Oct 19, 2020

leonardo-m commented Oct 19, 2020

petrochenkov Oct 19, 2020

petrochenkov Oct 19, 2020

leonardo-m commented Oct 19, 2020 •

edited

Loading

Implement const expressions and patterns (RFC 2920) #77124

Implement const expressions and patterns (RFC 2920) #77124

Conversation

spastorino commented Sep 23, 2020 • edited Loading

rust-highfive commented Sep 23, 2020

lcnr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

This comment has been minimized.

bors commented Oct 17, 2020

bors commented Oct 17, 2020

leonardo-m commented Oct 18, 2020

jplatte commented Oct 19, 2020

leonardo-m commented Oct 19, 2020

petrochenkov Oct 19, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

petrochenkov Oct 19, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

leonardo-m commented Oct 19, 2020 • edited Loading

spastorino commented Sep 23, 2020 •

edited

Loading

leonardo-m commented Oct 19, 2020 •

edited

Loading