Revert "appveyor: Use VS2017 for all our images" #56201
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This reverts commit 008e5dc.
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors: r+ p=1 |
|
📌 Commit 91f8e37 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 24, 2018
Revert "appveyor: Use VS2017 for all our images" This reverts commit 008e5dc (#55935) We suspect this causes the spurious failure in #55906 (comment) and #55915 (comment). r? @alexcrichton
|
☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis |
alexcrichton
added a commit
to alexcrichton/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 1, 2019
Originally added in rust-lang#55935 to test build times, this was reverted in rust-lang#56201 due to a belief that it caused the exit code 259 spurious errors. We've since learned, however, that the 259 exit code is likely not related to this image update as we're getting it in a number of locations now. VS2017 looks like it may be required to compile LLVm in the near future, notably discovered by rust-lang#58408 where we attempted to update LLVM.
kennytm
added a commit
to kennytm/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2019
…-Simulacrum appveyor: Use VS2017 for all our images Originally added in rust-lang#55935 to test build times, this was reverted in rust-lang#56201 due to a belief that it caused the exit code 259 spurious errors. We've since learned, however, that the 259 exit code is likely not related to this image update as we're getting it in a number of locations now. VS2017 looks like it may be required to compile LLVm in the near future, notably discovered by rust-lang#58408 where we attempted to update LLVM.
pietroalbini
added a commit
to pietroalbini/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 12, 2019
…-Simulacrum appveyor: Use VS2017 for all our images Originally added in rust-lang#55935 to test build times, this was reverted in rust-lang#56201 due to a belief that it caused the exit code 259 spurious errors. We've since learned, however, that the 259 exit code is likely not related to this image update as we're getting it in a number of locations now. VS2017 looks like it may be required to compile LLVm in the near future, notably discovered by rust-lang#58408 where we attempted to update LLVM.
kennytm
added a commit
to kennytm/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 15, 2019
…-Simulacrum appveyor: Use VS2017 for all our images Originally added in rust-lang#55935 to test build times, this was reverted in rust-lang#56201 due to a belief that it caused the exit code 259 spurious errors. We've since learned, however, that the 259 exit code is likely not related to this image update as we're getting it in a number of locations now. VS2017 looks like it may be required to compile LLVm in the near future, notably discovered by rust-lang#58408 where we attempted to update LLVM.
kennytm
added a commit
to kennytm/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 16, 2019
…-Simulacrum appveyor: Use VS2017 for all our images Originally added in rust-lang#55935 to test build times, this was reverted in rust-lang#56201 due to a belief that it caused the exit code 259 spurious errors. We've since learned, however, that the 259 exit code is likely not related to this image update as we're getting it in a number of locations now. VS2017 looks like it may be required to compile LLVm in the near future, notably discovered by rust-lang#58408 where we attempted to update LLVM.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This reverts commit 008e5dc (#55935)
We suspect this causes the spurious failure in #55906 (comment) and #55915 (comment).
r? @alexcrichton