librustc_lint: In recursion warning, change 'recurring' to 'recursing' #53550
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
r? @pnkfelix (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
This wording definitely sounds clearer to me too. |
|
Ping from triage @pnkfelix! This PR needs your review. |
|
Ping from triage @pnkfelix / @rust-lang/compiler: This PR requires your review. |
|
@brson: I think we might as well update the text to a more accurate description now (along the lines of |
|
@bors r+ rollup |
|
📌 Commit f4d6362 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
@varkor we can do that as a separate PR |
kennytm
added a commit
to kennytm/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 7, 2018
librustc_lint: In recursion warning, change 'recurring' to 'recursing' The existing wording seems incorrect. Aside: This warning, 'function cannot return without recursing' is not perfectly clear - it implies that the function _can_ return, it's just got to recurse. But really the fn cannot return period. Clearer wording: 'function recurses infinitely; it cannot return'; or 'function is infinitely self-recursive; it cannot return, and this is probably an error'. I like that.
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 7, 2018
Rollup of 17 pull requests Successful merges: - #53299 (Updated core/macros.rs to note it works in a no_std environment.) - #53376 (Cross reference io::copy and fs::copy in docs.) - #53455 (Individual docs for {from,to}_*_bytes) - #53550 (librustc_lint: In recursion warning, change 'recurring' to 'recursing') - #53860 (Migrate (some) of run-pass/ to ui) - #53874 (Implement Unpin for Box, Rc, and Arc) - #53895 (tidy: Cleanups and clippy warning fixes) - #53946 (Clarify `ManuallyDrop` docs) - #53948 (Minimized clippy test from when NLL disabled two-phase borrows) - #53959 (Add .git extension to submodule paths missing it) - #53966 (A few cleanups and minor improvements to mir/dataflow) - #53967 (propagate build.python into cmake) - #53979 (Remove `#[repr(transparent)]` from atomics) - #53991 (Add unchecked_shl/shr check for intrinsics to fix miri's test suit) - #53992 (migrate run-pass/borrowck to ui/run-pass) - #53994 (migrate run-pass/*/ to ui/run-pass) - #54023 (update clippy submodule)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The existing wording seems incorrect.
Aside: This warning, 'function cannot return without recursing' is not perfectly clear - it implies that the function can return, it's just got to recurse. But really the fn cannot return period. Clearer wording: 'function recurses infinitely; it cannot return'; or 'function is infinitely self-recursive; it cannot return, and this is probably an error'. I like that.