Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Stabilize use_extern_macros #50911

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 17, 2018
Merged

Stabilize use_extern_macros #50911

merged 2 commits into from
Aug 17, 2018

Conversation

petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

@petrochenkov petrochenkov commented May 20, 2018

Closes #35896

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @cramertj

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label May 20, 2018
@petrochenkov petrochenkov added S-waiting-on-crater Status: Waiting on a crater run to be completed. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 20, 2018
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor Author

r? @kennytm

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned kennytm and unassigned cramertj May 20, 2018
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bors try

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 20, 2018

⌛ Trying commit 66dfde18bfdfe1f9ae1c516e56228c77284a90b5 with merge ea32c49808849674e3d126b5732b2abfba9ed226...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 20, 2018

☀️ Test successful - status-travis
State: approved= try=True

@kennytm
Copy link
Member

kennytm commented May 20, 2018

cc @rust-lang/infra Crater run (check only) requested.

@pietroalbini
Copy link
Member

Crater run (check only) started.

@pietroalbini
Copy link
Member

Hi @kennytm (crater requester, PR reviewer)! Crater results are at: http://cargobomb-reports.s3.amazonaws.com/pr-50911/index.html. 'Blacklisted' crates (spurious failures etc) can be found here. If you see any spurious failures not on the list, please make a PR against that file.

(interested observers: Crater is a tool for testing the impact of changes on the crates.io ecosystem. You can find out more at the repo if you're curious)

@pietroalbini pietroalbini added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-crater Status: Waiting on a crater run to be completed. labels May 24, 2018
@kennytm
Copy link
Member

kennytm commented May 24, 2018

6 regressions.

  • verilog: Seems to be spurious ("Read-only file system" cc @pietroalbini).
  • npbot: This PR seems to have broken its use of structopt-^0.2.5 via quicli-0.2.0. Legit.
  • The rest: All due to #[macro_use] no longer needed, which causes #[deny(warnings)] to error out. Legit but expected.
Relevant source code in npbot-1.0.0
[dependencies]
structopt = "0.2.5"
#[macro_use]
extern crate quicli;

// ...

use structopt::StructOpt;
use quicli::prelude::*;

// ...

#[derive(StructOpt)]
pub(crate) struct Opt {
    #[structopt(short = "d", long = "debug", help = "only use the local, println!() sink")]
    debug: bool,
    #[structopt(long = "verbose", short = "v", parse(from_occurrences))]
    verbose: u8,

    // for the SoundTouch source
    #[structopt(long = "soundtouch-host")]
    soundtouch_host: Option<String>,

    // for the last.fm source
    #[structopt(long = "lastfm-api-key")]
    lastfm_api_key: Option<String>,
    #[structopt(long = "lastfm-username")]
    lastfm_username: Option<String>,
}

Note the lack of #[macro_use] extern crate structopt.

Error log
May 22 22:49:57.928 INFO kablam! error[E0658]: The attribute `structopt` is currently unknown to the compiler and may have meaning added to it in the future (see issue #29642)
May 22 22:49:57.928 INFO kablam!   --> src/main.rs:41:5
May 22 22:49:57.928 INFO kablam!    |
May 22 22:49:57.928 INFO kablam! 41 |     #[structopt(short = "d", long = "debug", help = "only use the local, println!() sink")]
May 22 22:49:57.928 INFO kablam!    |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
May 22 22:49:57.928 INFO kablam!    |
May 22 22:49:57.929 INFO kablam!    = help: add #![feature(custom_attribute)] to the crate attributes to enable
May 22 22:49:57.929 INFO kablam! 
May 22 22:49:57.929 INFO kablam! error[E0658]: The attribute `structopt` is currently unknown to the compiler and may have meaning added to it in the future (see issue #29642)
May 22 22:49:57.929 INFO kablam!   --> src/main.rs:43:5
May 22 22:49:57.929 INFO kablam!    |
May 22 22:49:57.929 INFO kablam! 43 |     #[structopt(long = "verbose", short = "v", parse(from_occurrences))]
May 22 22:49:57.929 INFO kablam!    |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
May 22 22:49:57.929 INFO kablam!    |
May 22 22:49:57.929 INFO kablam!    = help: add #![feature(custom_attribute)] to the crate attributes to enable
May 22 22:49:57.929 INFO kablam! 
May 22 22:49:57.929 INFO kablam! error[E0658]: The attribute `structopt` is currently unknown to the compiler and may have meaning added to it in the future (see issue #29642)
May 22 22:49:57.929 INFO kablam!   --> src/main.rs:47:5
May 22 22:49:57.929 INFO kablam!    |
May 22 22:49:57.929 INFO kablam! 47 |     #[structopt(long = "soundtouch-host")]
May 22 22:49:57.929 INFO kablam!    |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
May 22 22:49:57.929 INFO kablam!    |
May 22 22:49:57.929 INFO kablam!    = help: add #![feature(custom_attribute)] to the crate attributes to enable
May 22 22:49:57.929 INFO kablam! 
May 22 22:49:57.929 INFO kablam! error[E0658]: The attribute `structopt` is currently unknown to the compiler and may have meaning added to it in the future (see issue #29642)
May 22 22:49:57.929 INFO kablam!   --> src/main.rs:51:5
May 22 22:49:57.929 INFO kablam!    |
May 22 22:49:57.929 INFO kablam! 51 |     #[structopt(long = "lastfm-api-key")]
May 22 22:49:57.929 INFO kablam!    |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
May 22 22:49:57.929 INFO kablam!    |
May 22 22:49:57.929 INFO kablam!    = help: add #![feature(custom_attribute)] to the crate attributes to enable
May 22 22:49:57.929 INFO kablam! 
May 22 22:49:57.930 INFO kablam! error[E0658]: The attribute `structopt` is currently unknown to the compiler and may have meaning added to it in the future (see issue #29642)
May 22 22:49:57.930 INFO kablam!   --> src/main.rs:53:5
May 22 22:49:57.930 INFO kablam!    |
May 22 22:49:57.930 INFO kablam! 53 |     #[structopt(long = "lastfm-username")]
May 22 22:49:57.930 INFO kablam!    |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
May 22 22:49:57.930 INFO kablam!    |
May 22 22:49:57.930 INFO kablam!    = help: add #![feature(custom_attribute)] to the crate attributes to enable
May 22 22:49:57.930 INFO kablam! 
May 22 22:49:57.931 INFO kablam! error: aborting due to 5 previous errors

@kennytm kennytm added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 24, 2018
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'll look what happens with npbot.

MacroBinding::Global(binding)
} else {
return None;
};

if !self.use_extern_macros {
if let Some(scope) = possible_time_travel {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

FIXME: possible_time_travel is now unused

@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor Author

It looks like npbot legitimately encounters a case of indeterminate resolution when macro expansion cannot progress and generates dummy fragments to recover.

So the error should be something like "cannot determine resolution for the derive macro StructOpt".

However, due to a scary hole in our macro resolution checking such dummy expansions can happen silently without generating any errors.
So we are seeing only secondary errors about unknown structopt attributes instead of the actual error about unresolved StructOpt.
I'll prepare a fix.

@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor Author

Fixed in #51145

@petrochenkov petrochenkov changed the title [Do not merge] Stabilize use_extern_macros Stabilize use_extern_macros May 30, 2018
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor Author

r? @alexcrichton

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 21, 2018
resolve: Some macro resolution refactoring

Work towards completing #50911 (comment)

The last commit also fixes #53269 by not using `def_id()` on `Def::Err` and also fixes #53512.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2018
resolve: Future proof resolutions for potentially built-in attributes

Based on #53778

This is not full "pass all attributes through name resolution", but a more conservative solution.
If built-in attribute is ambiguous with any other macro in scope, then an error is reported.
TODO: Explain what complications arise with the full solution.

cc #50911 (comment)
Closes #53531
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2018
Feature gate non-builtin attributes in inner attribute position

Closes item 3 from #50911 (comment)
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2018
resolve: Future proof resolutions for potentially built-in attributes

This is not full "pass all attributes through name resolution", but a more conservative solution.
If built-in attribute is ambiguous with any other macro in scope, then an error is reported.

What complications arise with the full solution - #53913 (comment).

cc #50911 (comment)
cc #52269
Closes #53531
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2018
Temporarily prohibit proc macro attributes placed after derives

... and also proc macro attributes used together with `#[test]`/`#[bench]`.

Addresses item 6 from #50911 (comment).

The end goal is straightforward predictable left-to-right expansion order for attributes.
Right now derives are expanded last regardless of their relative ordering with macro attributes and right now it's simpler to temporarily prohibit macro attributes placed after derives than changing the expansion order.
I'm not sure whether the new beta is already released or not, but if it's released, then this patch needs to be backported, so the solution needs to be minimal.

How to fix broken code (derives):
- Move macro attributes above derives. This won't change expansion order, they are expanded before derives anyway.

Using attribute macros on same items with `#[test]` and `#[bench]` is prohibited for similar expansion order reasons, but this one is going to be reverted much sooner than restrictions on derives.

How to fix broken code (test/bench):
- Enable `#![feature(plugin)]` (don't ask why).

r? @ghost
@softprops
Copy link

The 1.30.0 release notes for #[macro_export(local_inner_macros)] link here.

Where can I find more documentation on this feature?

So far I've tried local_inner_macros in two cases where a crate's macros depended on anothers and it didn't work in either case.

iliana/rust-crowbar#46 (comment)

dtolnay/mashup#16

@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@softprops
Copy link

@petrochenkov thanks! I'll take a look and report back if it looks like what I'm trying to do, re-export transitive dependency crates macros` is actually what this new feature supports.

@softprops
Copy link

softprops commented Oct 26, 2018

@petrochenkov l need to do a bit more testing but I worked it out, at least enough to get a fork of rust crowbar to compile. I still need to test a crate that uses that fork before I can call this 👍 'd

It may not be clear to new rust users that for foreign macros, you'll also need namespace the macro's path. In my case I just needed to prefix crowbars use of cpython's macros with cpython:: in the docs you linked to and users will find you only use local macros in examples using $crate::. Assuming macros authors are already going to be a bit more advanced than the beginner rust users they may be able to discover this for themselves. I'd recommend adding at least one foreign macro example for the sake of beginner/advanced user inclusivity. Albeit this would be much more painful for the example of supporting old rust versions because if forces users to copy and paste the entire macro srcs from other crates. The format_args is probably the simplest case for a macro. A more complex examples will be much more awkward. For now, asking users to use the latest stable works well enough!

@softprops
Copy link

found a potential bug but I'm not sure if its by design

when experimenting with the $crate:: path prefix with #[macro_export(local_inner_macros)] and with #[macro_export] I found this interesting inconsistency gotcha with the way that exported macro can be used.

with #[macro_export(local_inner_macros)] I can do the following

extern crate crowbar;
crowbar::lambda!(...)

however with #[macro_export] I get the following here using the same path references

extern crate crowbar;
crowbar::lambda!(...)
error: cannot find macro `lambda!` in this scope

interestingly though I can do the following with #[macro_export]

extern crate crowbar;
use crowbar::lambda;
lambda!(...)

this feels a bit inconsistent in the way the newer system attempts to line up with what you can do with path references for non macro items.

@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor Author

petrochenkov commented Oct 26, 2018

@softprops
I suspect that the lambda macro is recursive and calls itself by relative name (lambda!(...)), in other words, it's its own helper.

This way the first iteration crowbar::lambda!(...) is resolved successfully, but the next iterations cannot be resolved without bringing lambda in scope at use-site or using local_inner_macros at def-site.

@softprops
Copy link

@petrochenkov 100%. that was it. thanks!

@petrochenkov petrochenkov deleted the macuse branch June 5, 2019 16:16
ti-chi-bot pushed a commit to tikv/tikv that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2021
Signed-off-by: JmPotato <[email protected]>

### What problem does this PR solve?

Import macros from other crates with the `use` syntax. 

### What is changed and how it works?

rust-lang/rust#50911

### Check List <!--REMOVE the items that are not applicable-->

Tests <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->

- Unit test
- Integration test

### Release note <!-- bugfixes or new feature need a release note -->

* No release note.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-macros-1.2 Area: Declarative macros 1.2 relnotes Marks issues that should be documented in the release notes of the next release. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-lang Relevant to the language team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.