Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 9 pull requests #33632

Merged
merged 27 commits into from
May 14, 2016
Merged

Rollup of 9 pull requests #33632

merged 27 commits into from
May 14, 2016

Conversation

dotdash and others added 27 commits May 11, 2016 18:35
Currently, to prepare for MIR trans, we break _all_ critical edges,
although we only actually need to do this for edges originating from a
call that gets translated to an invoke instruction in LLVM.

This has the unfortunate effect of undoing a bunch of the things that
SimplifyCfg has done. A particularly bad case arises when you have a
C-like enum with N variants and a derived PartialEq implementation.

In that case, the match on the (&lhs, &rhs) tuple gets translated into
nested matches with N arms each and a basic block each, resulting in N²
basic blocks. SimplifyCfg reduces that to roughly 2*N basic blocks, but
breaking the critical edges means that we go back to N².

In nickel.rs, there is such an enum with roughly N=800. So we get about
640K basic blocks or 2.5M lines of LLVM IR. LLVM takes a while to
reduce that to the final "disr_a == disr_b".

So before this patch, we had 2.5M lines of IR with 640K basic blocks,
which took about about 3.6s in LLVM to get optimized and translated.
After this patch, we get about 650K lines with about 1.6K basic blocks
and spent a little less than 0.2s in LLVM.

cc rust-lang#33111
Currently, all switches in MIR are exhausitive, meaning that we can have
a lot of arms that all go to the same basic block, the extreme case
being an if-let expression which results in just 2 possible cases, be
might end up with hundreds of arms for large enums.

To improve this situation and give LLVM less code to chew on, we can
detect whether there's a pre-dominant target basic block in a switch
and then promote this to be the default target, not translating the
corresponding arms at all.

In combination with rust-lang#33544 this makes unoptimized MIR trans of
nickel.rs as fast as using old trans and greatly improves the times for
optimized builds, which are only 30-40% slower instead of ~300%.

cc rust-lang#33111
If the path we give to libbacktrace doesn't actually correspond to the
current process, libbacktrace will segfault *at best*.

cc rust-lang#21889
… r=Aatch

Only break critical edges where actually needed

Currently, to prepare for MIR trans, we break _all_ critical edges,
although we only actually need to do this for edges originating from a
call that gets translated to an invoke instruction in LLVM.

This has the unfortunate effect of undoing a bunch of the things that
SimplifyCfg has done. A particularly bad case arises when you have a
C-like enum with N variants and a derived PartialEq implementation.

In that case, the match on the (&lhs, &rhs) tuple gets translated into
nested matches with N arms each and a basic block each, resulting in N²
basic blocks. SimplifyCfg reduces that to roughly 2*N basic blocks, but
breaking the critical edges means that we go back to N².

In nickel.rs, there is such an enum with roughly N=800. So we get about
640K basic blocks or 2.5M lines of LLVM IR. LLVM takes a while to
reduce that to the final "disr_a == disr_b".

So before this patch, we had 2.5M lines of IR with 640K basic blocks,
which took about about 3.6s in LLVM to get optimized and translated.
After this patch, we get about 650K lines with about 1.6K basic blocks
and spent a little less than 0.2s in LLVM.

cc rust-lang#33111

r? @Aatch
[MIR] Enhance the SimplifyCfg pass to merge consecutive blocks

Updated from rust-lang#30238, including the changes suggested by @Aatch.
…hton

Don't use env::current_exe with libbacktrace

If the path we give to libbacktrace doesn't actually correspond to the
current process, libbacktrace will segfault *at best*.

cc rust-lang#21889

r? @alexcrichton
cc @semarie
…sakis

Remove unification despite ambiguity in projection

Turns out that closures aren't explicitly considered in `project.rs`, so the ambiguity handling w.r.t. closures can just be removed as the change done in `select.rs` covers it.

r? @nikomatsakis
Use symlink_metadata in tidy to avoid panicking on broken symlinks.

r? @alexcrichton
[MIR trans] Optimize trans for biased switches

Currently, all switches in MIR are exhausitive, meaning that we can have
a lot of arms that all go to the same basic block, the extreme case
being an if-let expression which results in just 2 possible cases, be
might end up with hundreds of arms for large enums.

To improve this situation and give LLVM less code to chew on, we can
detect whether there's a pre-dominant target basic block in a switch
and then promote this to be the default target, not translating the
corresponding arms at all.

In combination with rust-lang#33544 this makes unoptimized MIR trans of
nickel.rs as fast as using old trans and greatly improves the times for
optimized builds, which are only 30-40% slower instead of ~300%.

cc rust-lang#33111
Support references to outer type params for assoc consts

Fixes rust-lang#28809

r? @eddyb
… r=nikomatsakis

trans-collector: Assorted fixes and refactorings needed for making trans collector-driven.

As the title says. The messages on the individual commits should do a good job of explaining what they are about.

r? @nikomatsakis
Plumb inference obligations through selection, take 2

Using a `SnapshotVec` and dumping inferred obligations into `Vtable` variants.

r? @nikomatsakis
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @nikomatsakis

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@Manishearth
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ p=10

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 14, 2016

📌 Commit 61d87f0 has been approved by Manishearth

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 14, 2016

⌛ Testing commit 61d87f0 with merge 6ba8a1a...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request May 14, 2016
Rollup of 9 pull requests

- Successful merges: #33544, #33552, #33554, #33555, #33560, #33566, #33572, #33574, #33576
- Failed merges:
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup A PR which is a rollup
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.