Advise against removing the remaining Python scripts from tests/run-make
#129387
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This makes it easier for maintainers to see what the Python script is for.
Trying to get rid of this Python script looks tempting, because it's currently the only Python script in the whole `run-make` suite that we actually run. But getting rid of it would require pulling in a Rust crate to parse XML instead, and that's probably not worth the extra hassle for a relatively-minor test.
rustbot
added
A-run-make
|
This PR modifies cc @jieyouxu |
|
Feel free to r=me once PR CI is green. |
|
PR CI is green. @bors r=jieyouxu |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
jieyouxu
added a commit
to jieyouxu/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 22, 2024
Advise against removing the remaining Python scripts from `tests/run-make` After some recent PRs (e.g. rust-lang#129185), there are only two Python scripts left in `tests/run-make`. Having come so far, it's tempting to try to get rid of the remaining ones. But after trying that myself, I've come to the conclusion that it's not worth the extra hassle, especially if it means pulling in an XML-parsing crate just for one test. This PR therefore leaves behind a few signpost comments to explain why getting rid of these particular scripts has low value.
Open
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 22, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#128432 (WASI: forbid `unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn` for `std::{os, sys}`) - rust-lang#129373 (Add missing module flags for CFI and KCFI sanitizers) - rust-lang#129374 (Use `assert_unsafe_precondition!` in `AsciiChar::digit_unchecked`) - rust-lang#129376 (Change `assert_unsafe_precondition` docs to refer to `check_language_ub`) - rust-lang#129382 (Add `const_cell_into_inner` to `OnceCell`) - rust-lang#129387 (Advise against removing the remaining Python scripts from `tests/run-make`) - rust-lang#129388 (Do not rely on names to find lifetimes.) - rust-lang#129395 (Pretty-print own args of existential projections (dyn-Trait w/ GAT constraints)) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 22, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#129387 - Zalathar:python-apologia, r=jieyouxu Advise against removing the remaining Python scripts from `tests/run-make` After some recent PRs (e.g. rust-lang#129185), there are only two Python scripts left in `tests/run-make`. Having come so far, it's tempting to try to get rid of the remaining ones. But after trying that myself, I've come to the conclusion that it's not worth the extra hassle, especially if it means pulling in an XML-parsing crate just for one test. This PR therefore leaves behind a few signpost comments to explain why getting rid of these particular scripts has low value.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
After some recent PRs (e.g. #129185), there are only two Python scripts left in
tests/run-make.Having come so far, it's tempting to try to get rid of the remaining ones. But after trying that myself, I've come to the conclusion that it's not worth the extra hassle, especially if it means pulling in an XML-parsing crate just for one test.
This PR therefore leaves behind a few signpost comments to explain why getting rid of these particular scripts has low value.