Print more verbose error for commands that capture output #129096
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
onur-ozkan
reviewed
Aug 15, 2024
onur-ozkan
approved these changes
Aug 15, 2024
Kobzol
force-pushed
the
bootstrap-cmd-verbosity
branch
from
d47c86d to
478d42b
Compare
|
I have to say that I wasn't a fan of the nit because of the |
That's even better! |
|
@bors r=onur-ozkan rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 15, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#128348 (Unconditionally allow shadow call-stack sanitizer for AArch64) - rust-lang#129065 (Use `impl PartialEq<TokenKind> for Token` more.) - rust-lang#129072 (Infer async closure args from `Fn` bound even if there is no corresponding `Future` bound on return) - rust-lang#129096 (Print more verbose error for commands that capture output) - rust-lang#129101 (Fix projections when parent capture is by-ref but child capture is by-value in the `ByMoveBody` pass) - rust-lang#129106 (Remove redundant type ops: `Eq`/`Subtype`) - rust-lang#129122 (Remove duplicated `Rustdoc::output` method from `run-make-support` lib) - rust-lang#129124 (rustdoc-json: Use FxHashMap from rustdoc_json_types) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 15, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#129096 - Kobzol:bootstrap-cmd-verbosity, r=onur-ozkan Print more verbose error for commands that capture output rust-lang#128874 made bootstrap command errors less verbose without `-v`. However, in some cases it's too extreme. If a command fails, it now outputs just `Command has failed. Rerun with -v to see more details.`, without providing any context. I think that I found a reasonable heuristic to figure out when we should print a more verbose error. When the command doesn't capture output, its stdout/stderr is printed, therefore the user sees context about the error. However, when the command captures its output, the user won't see any error message in the output, which is not great. So only in that case, bootstrap now prints a slightly more verbose output (and also prints the captured output). r? `@onur-ozkan`
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
#128874 made bootstrap command errors less verbose without
-v. However, in some cases it's too extreme. If a command fails, it now outputs justCommand has failed. Rerun with -v to see more details., without providing any context.I think that I found a reasonable heuristic to figure out when we should print a more verbose error. When the command doesn't capture output, its stdout/stderr is printed, therefore the user sees context about the error. However, when the command captures its output, the user won't see any error message in the output, which is not great. So only in that case, bootstrap now prints a slightly more verbose output (and also prints the captured output).
r? @onur-ozkan