Rollup of 6 pull requests #127156
Merged
Rollup of 6 pull requests #127156
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Since <rust-lang#121358>, `TypeId` is represented as a `(u64, u64)`. This also made the debug implementation a lot larger, which is especially apparent with pretty formatting. Make this less noisy by converting the inner value back to a `u128` then printing as a tuple struct. Current: TypeId { t: (1403077013027291752, 4518903163082958039) } TypeId { t: ( 1403077013027291752, 4518903163082958039, ), } New: TypeId(25882202575019293479932656973818029271) TypeId( 25882202575019293479932656973818029271, )
Updated docs on `#[panic_handler]` in `library/core/src/lib.rs`
…=Mark-Simulacrum Add `.ignore` file to make `config.toml` searchable in vscode Based on this answer on [Stack Overflow](https://stackoverflow.com/a/72059075).
… r=Mark-Simulacrum Small fixme in core now that split_first has no codegen issues rust-lang#109328 (comment) BTW, I have a crate implementing exactly this kind of an iterator: https://github.com/GrigorenkoPV/head-tail-iter and I was wondering if it would be worthwhile to try and make an ACP for it to get it included in std (or maybe itertools). My only doubt is that it kinda incentives writing O(n^2) algorithms and is not the hard to replace with a `while let` loop (just as in this PR).
…acrum CI: rename Rust for Linux CI job The `rfl` name was not very [descriptive](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/242791-t-infra/topic/Testing.20Rust.20for.20Linux.20in.20our.20CI/near/447408854). try-job: x86_64-rust-for-linux
…ler-errors Remove unused `rustc_trait_selection` dependencies Found using `cargo-machete`. The `bitflags` and `derivative` crates were added for the new trait solver, but weren't removed when the next trait solver code was uplifted to a separate crate.
Print `TypeId` as a `u128` for `Debug` Since <rust-lang#121358>, `TypeId` is represented as a `(u64, u64)`. This also made the debug implementation a lot larger, which is especially apparent with pretty formatting. Change this to convert the inner value back to a `u128` and then print as a tuple struct to make this less noisy. Current: TypeId { t: (1403077013027291752, 4518903163082958039) } TypeId { t: ( 1403077013027291752, 4518903163082958039, ), } New: TypeId(25882202575019293479932656973818029271) TypeId( 25882202575019293479932656973818029271, )
rustbot
added
A-meta
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=6 |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 30, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#126705 (Updated docs on `#[panic_handler]` in `library/core/src/lib.rs`) - rust-lang#126876 (Add `.ignore` file to make `config.toml` searchable in vscode) - rust-lang#126906 (Small fixme in core now that split_first has no codegen issues) - rust-lang#127023 (CI: rename Rust for Linux CI job) - rust-lang#127131 (Remove unused `rustc_trait_selection` dependencies) - rust-lang#127134 (Print `TypeId` as a `u128` for `Debug`) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot) |
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors retry |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
|
📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:
previous master: 2975a21b5d In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: |
Closed
|
Finished benchmarking commit (6c34855): comparison URL. Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. CyclesResults (secondary 1.9%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 695.757s -> 696.099s (0.05%) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
#[panic_handler]inlibrary/core/src/lib.rs#126705 (Updated docs on#[panic_handler]inlibrary/core/src/lib.rs).ignorefile to makeconfig.tomlsearchable in vscode #126876 (Add.ignorefile to makeconfig.tomlsearchable in vscode)rustc_trait_selectiondependencies #127131 (Remove unusedrustc_trait_selectiondependencies)TypeIdas au128forDebug#127134 (PrintTypeIdas au128forDebug)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup