Fixes for 32-bit SPARC on Linux #126907
Merged
Fixes for 32-bit SPARC on Linux #126907
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
While at it, order the list of architectures alphabetically.
While at it, order the list of architectures alphabetically.
|
These commits modify compiler targets. This PR changes how LLVM is built. Consider updating src/bootstrap/download-ci-llvm-stamp. |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
While at it, order the list of architectures alphabetically.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
The previously -mv8plus parameter is supported by GCC only, so let's use something that the SPARC backend in LLVM supports as well.
|
Seems reasonable enough. Thank you! |
|
@bors r+ |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
compiler-errors
added a commit
to compiler-errors/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 25, 2024
Fixes for 32-bit SPARC on Linux This PR fixes a number of issues which previously prevented `rustc` from being built successfully for 32-bit SPARC using the `sparc-unknown-linux-gnu` triplet. In particular, it adds linking against `libatomic` where necessary, uses portable `AtomicU64` for `rustc_data_structures` and rewrites the spec for `sparc_unknown_linux_gnu` to use `TargetOptions` and replaces the previously used `-mv8plus` with the more portable `-mcpu=v9 -m32`. To make `rustc` build successfully, support for 32-bit SPARC needs to be added to the `object` crate as well as the `nix` crate which I will be sending out later as well. r? nagisa
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 25, 2024
…mpiler-errors Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#126893 (Eliminate the distinction between PREC_POSTFIX and PREC_PAREN precedence level) - rust-lang#126907 (Fixes for 32-bit SPARC on Linux) - rust-lang#126932 (Tweak `FlatPat::new` to avoid a temporarily-invalid state) - rust-lang#126934 (fix broken build cache caused by rustdoc builds) - rust-lang#126943 (De-duplicate all consecutive native libs regardless of their options) - rust-lang#126946 (Add missing slash in `const_eval_select` doc comment) - rust-lang#126947 (Delegation: ast lowering refactor) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
|
Finished benchmarking commit (536235f): comparison URL. Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)Results (primary -2.0%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 696.052s -> 694.809s (-0.18%) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR fixes a number of issues which previously prevented
rustcfrom being builtsuccessfully for 32-bit SPARC using the
sparc-unknown-linux-gnutriplet.In particular, it adds linking against
libatomicwhere necessary, uses portableAtomicU64for
rustc_data_structuresand rewrites the spec forsparc_unknown_linux_gnuto useTargetOptionsand replaces the previously used-mv8pluswith the more portable-mcpu=v9 -m32.To make
rustcbuild successfully, support for 32-bit SPARC needs to be added to theobjectcrate as well as the
nixcrate which I will be sending out later as well.r? nagisa