Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

further clarify C11 and C/C++11 terminology #169

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 12, 2019
Merged

further clarify C11 and C/C++11 terminology #169

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 3 additions & 3 deletions src/atomics.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -6,9 +6,9 @@ this model is quite complex and known to have [several flaws][C11-busted].
Rather, it is a pragmatic concession to the fact that *everyone* is pretty bad
at modeling atomics. At very least, we can benefit from existing tooling and
research around the C/C++ memory model.
(You'll often see this model referred to as "C11" or "C/C++11". C and C++ share their
memory model and those were the first versions but they have received some bugfixes
since then.)
(You'll often see this model referred to as "C/C++11" or just "C11". C just copies
the C++ memory model; and C++11 was the first version of the model but it has
received some bugfixes since then.)

Trying to fully explain the model in this book is fairly hopeless. It's defined
in terms of madness-inducing causality graphs that require a full book to
Expand Down