Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: dedup join key in degree table #14701

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

fix: dedup join key in degree table #14701

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

fuyufjh
Copy link
Member

@fuyufjh fuyufjh commented Jan 20, 2024

I hereby agree to the terms of the RisingWave Labs, Inc. Contributor License Agreement.

What's changed and what's your intention?

Deduplicate columns in HashJoin's degree table. Check the ch_benchmark.yaml for example.

Limitation: Note that this only applies to values. For the key, the columns are still duplicated, e.g. primary key: [ $0 ASC, $1 ASC, $0 ASC ]. This is because the HashJoin executor assumes that the join key is always the first (second, third...) columns in state/degree table's PK. As a result, fixing that may require additional work, such as passing a join_key_columns_in_state_table in proto.

Checklist

  • I have written necessary rustdoc comments
  • I have added necessary unit tests and integration tests
  • I have added test labels as necessary. See details.
  • I have added fuzzing tests or opened an issue to track them. (Optional, recommended for new SQL features Sqlsmith: Sql feature generation #7934).
  • My PR contains breaking changes. (If it deprecates some features, please create a tracking issue to remove them in the future).
  • All checks passed in ./risedev check (or alias, ./risedev c)
  • My PR changes performance-critical code. (Please run macro/micro-benchmarks and show the results.)
  • My PR contains critical fixes that are necessary to be merged into the latest release. (Please check out the details)

Documentation

  • My PR needs documentation updates. (Please use the Release note section below to summarize the impact on users)

Release note

If this PR includes changes that directly affect users or other significant modifications relevant to the community, kindly draft a release note to provide a concise summary of these changes. Please prioritize highlighting the impact these changes will have on users.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the type/fix Bug fix label Jan 20, 2024
Copy link
Member

@BugenZhao BugenZhao left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

Since I'm not an expert in optimizer, I'm not sure whether there could be any potential issues similar to #7698 (comment).

@yuhao-su
Copy link
Contributor

You may also need to fix the dk_indices_in_jk for degree table

@fuyufjh
Copy link
Member Author

fuyufjh commented Jan 22, 2024

You may also need to fix the dk_indices_in_jk for degree table

I think not. Neither distribution key nor join key were affected. Let me add some test cases.

@yuhao-su
Copy link
Contributor

Neither distribution key nor join key were affected. Let me add some test cases.

You are right. I guess what really need to be fixed is exector code. e.g. this https://github.com/singularity-data/risingwave/blob/9cd7f6486e659af72857aef7ac27247305e880c0/src/stream/src/executor/managed_state/join/mod.rs#L79

@fuyufjh
Copy link
Member Author

fuyufjh commented Jan 22, 2024

Neither distribution key nor join key were affected. Let me add some test cases.

You are right. I guess what really need to be fixed is exector code. e.g. this https://github.com/singularity-data/risingwave/blob/9cd7f6486e659af72857aef7ac27247305e880c0/src/stream/src/executor/managed_state/join/mod.rs#L79

Seems no problem. order_key is projected with state_order_key_indices, which is from order_key_indices, which is from degree_table.pk_indices().to_vec()

Thanks for pointing this out.

The to_table_rows() (actually should be called to_degree_rows(), which builds a degree row from an incoming row), is hard to implement after this PR. This is because the projection from incoming row to degree row is missing. We need to pass this information in HashJoin's proto to make it work. This cause more trouble and I would rather close this PR.

@fuyufjh fuyufjh closed this Jan 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type/fix Bug fix
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants