Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update linters (major) #12550

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 8, 2021
Merged

chore(deps): update linters (major) #12550

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 8, 2021

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Nov 8, 2021

WhiteSource Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin 4.33.0 -> 5.2.0 age adoption passing confidence
@typescript-eslint/parser 4.33.0 -> 5.2.0 age adoption passing confidence
eslint (source) 7.32.0 -> 8.1.0 age adoption passing confidence
eslint-plugin-jest 24.7.0 -> 25.2.2 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint

v5.2.0

Compare Source

Note: Version bump only for package @​typescript-eslint/parser

v5.1.0

Compare Source

Note: Version bump only for package @​typescript-eslint/parser

v5.0.0

Compare Source

Features
eslint/eslint

v8.1.0

Compare Source

v8.0.1

Compare Source

v8.0.0

Compare Source

jest-community/eslint-plugin-jest

v25.2.2

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • require-hook: check variables are either const or declarations (#​959) (ce8cd61)

v25.2.1

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • expect-expect: don't error on it.todo & test.todo calls (#​954) (d3cc0db)

v25.2.0

Compare Source

Features
  • expect-expect: support additionalTestBlockFunctions option (#​850) (3b94c62)

v25.1.0

Compare Source

Features

25.0.6 (2021-10-14)

Bug Fixes

25.0.5 (2021-10-11)

Bug Fixes

25.0.4 (2021-10-11)

Bug Fixes
  • update @typescript-eslint/experimental-utils to v5 (#​941) (afad49a)

25.0.3 (2021-10-11)

Bug Fixes
  • valid-expect-in-promise: support awaited promises in arguments (#​936) (bd2c33c)

25.0.2 (2021-10-11)

Bug Fixes
  • valid-expect-in-promise: support out of order awaits (#​939) (07d2137)

25.0.1 (2021-10-10)

Bug Fixes
  • specify peer dependency ranges correctly (cb87458)

v25.0.6

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v25.0.5

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v25.0.4

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • update @typescript-eslint/experimental-utils to v5 (#​941) (afad49a)

v25.0.3

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • valid-expect-in-promise: support awaited promises in arguments (#​936) (bd2c33c)

v25.0.2

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • valid-expect-in-promise: support out of order awaits (#​939) (07d2137)

v25.0.1

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • specify peer dependency ranges correctly (cb87458)

v25.0.0

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
Features
  • add prefer-to-be to style ruleset (2a3376f)
  • lowercase-name: rename to prefer-lowercase-title (b860084)
  • prefer-to-be-null: remove rule (809bcda)
  • prefer-to-be-undefined: remove rule (3434d9b)
  • remove deprecated rules (#​661) (e8f16ec)
  • valid-describe: rename to valid-describe-callback (f3e9e9a)
BREAKING CHANGES
  • valid-describe: renamed valid-describe to valid-describe-callback
  • lowercase-name: renamed lowercase-name to prefer-lowercase-title
  • prefer-to-be-undefined: removed prefer-to-be-undefined rule
  • prefer-to-be-null: removed prefer-to-be-null rule
  • recommend prefer-to-be rule
  • Removes rules no-expect-resolves, no-truthy-falsy, no-try-expect, and prefer-inline-snapshots
  • Drop support for ESLint 5
  • Drop support for Node 10 and 15

Configuration

📅 Schedule: At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because other commits have been found.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, click this checkbox.

This PR has been generated by WhiteSource Renovate. View repository job log here.

@HonkingGoose
Copy link
Collaborator

@viceice ESLint has a migration guide here: https://eslint.org/docs/user-guide/migrating-to-8.0.0

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from JamieMagee as a code owner November 8, 2021 11:33
@viceice viceice mentioned this pull request Nov 8, 2021
6 tasks
@viceice viceice marked this pull request as draft November 8, 2021 11:37
@viceice viceice self-requested a review November 8, 2021 11:37
@viceice
Copy link
Member

viceice commented Nov 8, 2021

@rarkins I'm thinking of dropping airbnb lint rules? I don't see a big value.

I think using the normal recommend sets are enough.

@viceice
Copy link
Member

viceice commented Nov 8, 2021

Strange thing, lint don't fail on airbnb. Maybe those rules are already disabled 🤔

@rarkins
Copy link
Collaborator

rarkins commented Nov 8, 2021

@viceice fine by me

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/major-linters branch from 45ce32d to 407d92e Compare November 8, 2021 14:32
@viceice
Copy link
Member

viceice commented Nov 8, 2021

getting closer 😅
image

@rarkins
Copy link
Collaborator

rarkins commented Nov 8, 2021

@viceice do you want these fixes in a separate PR?

Copy link
Member

@viceice viceice left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think those are ok to have here.

@viceice viceice marked this pull request as ready for review November 8, 2021 14:54
@viceice viceice enabled auto-merge (squash) November 8, 2021 14:55
@viceice viceice merged commit a17ade8 into main Nov 8, 2021
@viceice viceice deleted the renovate/major-linters branch November 8, 2021 15:01
@renovate-release
Copy link
Collaborator

🎉 This PR is included in version 29.3.2 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 10, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants