Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix ABI breakage in 0.8.1 #706

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 12, 2023
Merged

Fix ABI breakage in 0.8.1 #706

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 12, 2023

Conversation

KitsuneRal
Copy link
Member

See the commit. Closes #702.

To avoid ABI breakage within 0.8.x. Fixes #702.
@KitsuneRal KitsuneRal added the bug/fix The library doesn't work as expected label Sep 11, 2023
@nvrWhere
Copy link
Collaborator

So I understand it broke the ABI but we're now reliant on this in Neochat. It would cause it not to compile.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

0.0% 0.0% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

warning The version of Java (11.0.17) you have used to run this analysis is deprecated and we will stop accepting it soon. Please update to at least Java 17.
Read more here

@KitsuneRal
Copy link
Member Author

:( Okay, guess we'll have to have both signatures side by side until 0.9 then. Fortunately this function is not virtual.

To satisfy Neochat that already ended up depending on the new (const)
signature.
@KitsuneRal KitsuneRal merged commit add4dda into dev Sep 12, 2023
16 checks passed
@KitsuneRal KitsuneRal deleted the kitsune/fix-abi-breakage branch September 12, 2023 05:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug/fix The library doesn't work as expected
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

ABI break in patch version 0.8.1
2 participants