Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade pulumi-terraform-bridge to v3.100.0 #2846

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 9, 2025

Conversation

iwahbe
Copy link
Member

@iwahbe iwahbe commented Jan 9, 2025

This PR was generated via $ upgrade-provider pulumi/pulumi-gcp --kind=bridge.


  • Updating Java Gen version from 0.21.0 to 1.0.0.
  • Upgrading pulumi-terraform-bridge from v3.99.0 to v3.100.0.

@iwahbe iwahbe enabled auto-merge (squash) January 9, 2025 16:34
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 9, 2025

Does the PR have any schema changes?

Looking good! No breaking changes found.
No new resources/functions.

Maintainer note: consult the runbook for dealing with any breaking changes.

@iwahbe iwahbe merged commit 25d1749 into master Jan 9, 2025
23 checks passed
@iwahbe iwahbe deleted the upgrade-pulumi-terraform-bridge-to-v3.100.0 branch January 9, 2025 17:31
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 9, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 0.00%. Comparing base (a3ba411) to head (498ef2a).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #2846   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage    0.00%   0.00%           
======================================
  Files           3       3           
  Lines         161     161           
======================================
  Misses        161     161           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@pulumi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR has been shipped in release v8.13.1.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants