Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Batch capella signatures with the rest of the block #11689

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 25, 2022

Conversation

potuz
Copy link
Contributor

@potuz potuz commented Nov 24, 2022

Credit to @terencechain for suggesting this. This PR moves signature aggregation of BLS_TO_EXECUTION_CHANGES with the rest of the signatures in the block.

@potuz potuz requested a review from a team as a code owner November 24, 2022 19:39
Comment on lines +163 to +165
if ctx.Err() != nil {
return nil, ctx.Err()
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is checking context error needed? I think that's often done to while loop or recursive loops

Copy link
Member

@terencechain terencechain left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lgtm besides the context error comment

@nisdas nisdas merged commit f9e0d4b into develop Nov 25, 2022
@delete-merged-branch delete-merged-branch bot deleted the batch-capella-signatures branch November 25, 2022 01:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants