-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 286
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Whitelist failsafe port response traffic in the raw table only #1718
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,279 @@ | ||
// +build fvtests | ||
|
||
// Copyright (c) 2018 Tigera, Inc. All rights reserved. | ||
// | ||
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); | ||
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. | ||
// You may obtain a copy of the License at | ||
// | ||
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 | ||
// | ||
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software | ||
// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, | ||
// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. | ||
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and | ||
// limitations under the License. | ||
|
||
package fv_test | ||
|
||
import ( | ||
"context" | ||
"fmt" | ||
"time" | ||
|
||
. "github.com/onsi/ginkgo" | ||
. "github.com/onsi/gomega" | ||
log "github.com/sirupsen/logrus" | ||
|
||
"github.com/projectcalico/felix/fv/containers" | ||
"github.com/projectcalico/felix/fv/workload" | ||
api "github.com/projectcalico/libcalico-go/lib/apis/v3" | ||
client "github.com/projectcalico/libcalico-go/lib/clientv3" | ||
"github.com/projectcalico/libcalico-go/lib/options" | ||
) | ||
|
||
var _ = Context("do-not-track policy tests; with 2 nodes", func() { | ||
|
||
var ( | ||
etcd *containers.Container | ||
felixes []*containers.Felix | ||
hostW [2]*workload.Workload | ||
client client.Interface | ||
cc *workload.ConnectivityChecker | ||
dumpedDiags bool | ||
) | ||
|
||
BeforeEach(func() { | ||
dumpedDiags = false | ||
options := containers.DefaultTopologyOptions() | ||
felixes, etcd, client = containers.StartNNodeEtcdTopology(2, options) | ||
cc = &workload.ConnectivityChecker{} | ||
|
||
// Start a host networked workload on each host for connectivity checks. | ||
for ii := range felixes { | ||
// We tell each workload to open: | ||
// - its normal (uninteresting) port, 8055 | ||
// - port 2379, which is both an inbound and an outbound failsafe port | ||
// - port 22, which is an inbound failsafe port. | ||
// This allows us to test the interaction between do-not-track policy and failsafe | ||
// ports. | ||
const portsToOpen = "8055,2379,22" | ||
hostW[ii] = workload.Run( | ||
felixes[ii], | ||
fmt.Sprintf("host%d", ii), | ||
"", // No interface name means "run in the host's namespace" | ||
felixes[ii].IP, | ||
portsToOpen, | ||
"tcp") | ||
} | ||
}) | ||
|
||
// Utility function to dump diags if the test failed. Should be called in the inner-most | ||
// AfterEach() to dump diags before the test is torn down. Only the first call for a given | ||
// test has any effect. | ||
dumpDiags := func() { | ||
if !CurrentGinkgoTestDescription().Failed || dumpedDiags { | ||
return | ||
} | ||
for ii := range felixes { | ||
iptSave, err := felixes[ii].ExecOutput("iptables-save", "-c") | ||
if err == nil { | ||
log.WithField("felix", ii).Info("iptables-save:\n" + iptSave) | ||
} | ||
ipR, err := felixes[ii].ExecOutput("ip", "r") | ||
if err == nil { | ||
log.WithField("felix", ii).Info("ip route:\n" + ipR) | ||
} | ||
} | ||
etcd.Exec("etcdctl", "ls", "--recursive", "/") | ||
|
||
} | ||
|
||
AfterEach(func() { | ||
dumpDiags() | ||
for _, f := range felixes { | ||
f.Stop() | ||
} | ||
etcd.Stop() | ||
}) | ||
|
||
expectFullConnectivity := func() { | ||
cc.ResetExpectations() | ||
cc.ExpectSome(felixes[0], hostW[1].Port(8055)) | ||
cc.ExpectSome(felixes[1], hostW[0].Port(8055)) | ||
cc.ExpectSome(felixes[0], hostW[1].Port(2379)) | ||
cc.ExpectSome(felixes[1], hostW[0].Port(2379)) | ||
cc.ExpectSome(felixes[0], hostW[1].Port(22)) | ||
cc.ExpectSome(felixes[1], hostW[0].Port(22)) | ||
cc.ExpectSome(etcd, hostW[1].Port(22)) | ||
cc.ExpectSome(etcd, hostW[0].Port(22)) | ||
cc.CheckConnectivityOffset(1) | ||
} | ||
|
||
It("before adding policy, should have connectivity between hosts", func() { | ||
expectFullConnectivity() | ||
}) | ||
|
||
Context("after adding host endpoints", func() { | ||
var ( | ||
ctx context.Context | ||
cancel context.CancelFunc | ||
) | ||
|
||
BeforeEach(func() { | ||
ctx, cancel = context.WithTimeout(context.Background(), 30*time.Second) | ||
|
||
for _, f := range felixes { | ||
hep := api.NewHostEndpoint() | ||
hep.Name = "eth0-" + f.Name | ||
hep.Labels = map[string]string{ | ||
"name": hep.Name, | ||
} | ||
hep.Spec.Node = f.Hostname | ||
hep.Spec.ExpectedIPs = []string{f.IP} | ||
_, err := client.HostEndpoints().Create(ctx, hep, options.SetOptions{}) | ||
Expect(err).NotTo(HaveOccurred()) | ||
} | ||
}) | ||
|
||
AfterEach(func() { | ||
dumpDiags() | ||
cancel() | ||
}) | ||
|
||
It("should implement untracked policy correctly", func() { | ||
// This test covers both normal connectivity and failsafe connectivity. We combine the | ||
// tests because we rely on the changes of normal connectivity at each step to make sure | ||
// that the policy has actually flowed through to the dataplane. | ||
|
||
By("having only failsafe connectivity to start with") | ||
cc.ExpectNone(felixes[0], hostW[1].Port(8055)) | ||
cc.ExpectNone(felixes[1], hostW[0].Port(8055)) | ||
cc.ExpectSome(felixes[0], hostW[1].Port(2379)) | ||
cc.ExpectSome(felixes[1], hostW[0].Port(2379)) | ||
// Port 22 is inbound-only so it'll be blocked by the (lack of egress policy). | ||
cc.ExpectNone(felixes[0], hostW[1].Port(22)) | ||
cc.ExpectNone(felixes[1], hostW[0].Port(22)) | ||
// But etcd should still be able to access it... | ||
cc.ExpectSome(etcd, hostW[1].Port(22)) | ||
cc.ExpectSome(etcd, hostW[0].Port(22)) | ||
cc.CheckConnectivity() | ||
|
||
host0Selector := fmt.Sprintf("name == 'eth0-%s'", felixes[0].Name) | ||
host1Selector := fmt.Sprintf("name == 'eth0-%s'", felixes[1].Name) | ||
|
||
By("Having connectivity after installing bidirectional policies") | ||
host0Pol := api.NewGlobalNetworkPolicy() | ||
host0Pol.Name = "host-0-pol" | ||
host0Pol.Spec.Selector = host0Selector | ||
host0Pol.Spec.DoNotTrack = true | ||
host0Pol.Spec.ApplyOnForward = true | ||
host0Pol.Spec.Ingress = []api.Rule{ | ||
{ | ||
Action: api.Allow, | ||
Source: api.EntityRule{ | ||
Selector: host1Selector, | ||
}, | ||
}, | ||
} | ||
host0Pol.Spec.Egress = []api.Rule{ | ||
{ | ||
Action: api.Allow, | ||
Destination: api.EntityRule{ | ||
Selector: host1Selector, | ||
}, | ||
}, | ||
} | ||
host0Pol, err := client.GlobalNetworkPolicies().Create(ctx, host0Pol, options.SetOptions{}) | ||
Expect(err).NotTo(HaveOccurred()) | ||
|
||
host1Pol := api.NewGlobalNetworkPolicy() | ||
host1Pol.Name = "host-1-pol" | ||
host1Pol.Spec.Selector = host1Selector | ||
host1Pol.Spec.DoNotTrack = true | ||
host1Pol.Spec.ApplyOnForward = true | ||
host1Pol.Spec.Ingress = []api.Rule{ | ||
{ | ||
Action: api.Allow, | ||
Source: api.EntityRule{ | ||
Selector: host0Selector, | ||
}, | ||
}, | ||
} | ||
host1Pol.Spec.Egress = []api.Rule{ | ||
{ | ||
Action: api.Allow, | ||
Destination: api.EntityRule{ | ||
Selector: host0Selector, | ||
}, | ||
}, | ||
} | ||
host1Pol, err = client.GlobalNetworkPolicies().Create(ctx, host1Pol, options.SetOptions{}) | ||
Expect(err).NotTo(HaveOccurred()) | ||
|
||
expectFullConnectivity() | ||
|
||
By("Having only failsafe connectivity after replacing host-0's egress rules with Deny") | ||
// Since there's no conntrack, removing rules in one direction is enough to prevent | ||
// connectivity in either direction. | ||
host0Pol.Spec.Egress = []api.Rule{ | ||
{ | ||
Action: api.Deny, | ||
Destination: api.EntityRule{ | ||
Selector: host0Selector, | ||
}, | ||
}, | ||
} | ||
host0Pol, err = client.GlobalNetworkPolicies().Update(ctx, host0Pol, options.SetOptions{}) | ||
Expect(err).NotTo(HaveOccurred()) | ||
|
||
cc.ResetExpectations() | ||
cc.ExpectNone(felixes[0], hostW[1].Port(8055)) | ||
cc.ExpectNone(felixes[1], hostW[0].Port(8055)) | ||
cc.ExpectSome(felixes[0], hostW[1].Port(2379)) | ||
cc.ExpectSome(felixes[1], hostW[0].Port(2379)) | ||
cc.ExpectNone(felixes[0], hostW[1].Port(22)) // Now blocked (lack of egress). | ||
cc.ExpectSome(felixes[1], hostW[0].Port(22)) // Still open due to failsafe. | ||
cc.ExpectSome(etcd, hostW[1].Port(22)) // Allowed by failsafe | ||
cc.ExpectSome(etcd, hostW[0].Port(22)) // Allowed by failsafe | ||
cc.CheckConnectivity() | ||
|
||
By("Having full connectivity after putting them back") | ||
host0Pol.Spec.Egress = []api.Rule{ | ||
{ | ||
Action: api.Allow, | ||
Destination: api.EntityRule{ | ||
Selector: host1Selector, | ||
}, | ||
}, | ||
} | ||
host0Pol, err = client.GlobalNetworkPolicies().Update(ctx, host0Pol, options.SetOptions{}) | ||
Expect(err).NotTo(HaveOccurred()) | ||
|
||
expectFullConnectivity() | ||
|
||
By("Having only failsafe connectivity after replacing host-0's ingress rules with Deny") | ||
host0Pol.Spec.Ingress = []api.Rule{ | ||
{ | ||
Action: api.Deny, | ||
Destination: api.EntityRule{ | ||
Selector: host0Selector, | ||
}, | ||
}, | ||
} | ||
host0Pol, err = client.GlobalNetworkPolicies().Update(ctx, host0Pol, options.SetOptions{}) | ||
Expect(err).NotTo(HaveOccurred()) | ||
|
||
cc.ResetExpectations() | ||
cc.ExpectNone(felixes[0], hostW[1].Port(8055)) | ||
cc.ExpectNone(felixes[1], hostW[0].Port(8055)) | ||
cc.ExpectSome(felixes[0], hostW[1].Port(2379)) | ||
cc.ExpectSome(felixes[1], hostW[0].Port(2379)) | ||
cc.ExpectNone(felixes[0], hostW[1].Port(22)) // Response traffic blocked by policy | ||
cc.ExpectSome(felixes[1], hostW[0].Port(22)) // Allowed by failsafe | ||
cc.ExpectSome(etcd, hostW[1].Port(22)) // Allowed by failsafe | ||
cc.ExpectSome(etcd, hostW[0].Port(22)) // Allowed by failsafe | ||
cc.CheckConnectivity() | ||
}) | ||
}) | ||
}) |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Note: I think default
callerSkip
here has changed from 1 to 2 - but I presume that that is what you want (for nicest debugging/reporting).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, exactly, I want it to report the failure on the test case line, not in
workload.go
.