Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

When py_check() returns False, Pony should truncate too large values in resulting ValueError message #169

Closed
socketpair opened this issue Mar 2, 2016 · 1 comment
Closed

When py_check() returns False, Pony should truncate too large values in resulting ValueError message #169

socketpair opened this issue Mar 2, 2016 · 1 comment
Assignees
@kozlovsky
Labels
enhancement
Milestone
0.6.5

Comments

@socketpair
Copy link

Suppose, value was a big BLOB....

In other words, we should truncate value (say, up to 100 symbols) if that value is str or bytes
@kozlovsky
Copy link
Member

Done

@kozlovsky kozlovsky added this to the 0.6.5 milestone Apr 1, 2016
@kozlovsky kozlovsky self-assigned this Apr 1, 2016
@kozlovsky kozlovsky changed the title when py_check() returns False, Pony should not include whole value in resulting ValueError message When py_check() returns False, Pony should truncate too large values in resulting ValueError message Apr 4, 2016
kozlovsky added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 4, 2016
@kozlovsky
Pony ORM Release 0.6.5 (2016-04-04)
e96fccb 
# Improvements

* Fixes #172: Query prefetch() method should load specified lazy attributes right in the main query if possible

# Bugfixes

* Fixes #168: Incorrect caching when slicing the same query multiple times
* Fixes #169: When py_check() returns False, Pony should truncate too large values in resulting ValueError message
* Fixes #171: AssertionError when saving changes of multiple objects
* Fixes #176: Autostripped strings are not validated correctly for Required attributes

See blog post for more detailed information: https://blog.ponyorm.com/2016/04/04/pony-orm-release-0-6-5/
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@kozlovsky kozlovsky

Labels
enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
0.6.5
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@socketpair @kozlovsky