-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 101
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Upgrade from v1.2 to v1.3 #87
Upgrade from v1.2 to v1.3 #87
Conversation
[requires migration. onchain or offchain?]
[do we need to upgrade?]
[upgrade required?]
[have no idea - Polkadot, Kusama, ...?]
…ks compilation?)
adapt paritytech/polkadot-sdk#1234 (UMP price for delivery + benchmarks compilation)
system-parachains/asset-hubs/asset-hub-kusama/src/xcm_config.rs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
system-parachains/asset-hubs/asset-hub-kusama/src/xcm_config.rs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
system-parachains/asset-hubs/asset-hub-polkadot/src/xcm_config.rs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
system-parachains/asset-hubs/asset-hub-polkadot/src/xcm_config.rs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Looks like @svyatonik maybe a rebase to re-trigger the bot check? or anyone with access to rebase from GH PR GUI. |
Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <[email protected]>
Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access
Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <[email protected]>
@acatangiu Pushed some commits - still required :/ |
Maybe that's the reason: #87 (comment). So if anything is pushed, then we need reviews again maybe? |
I'm currently investigating this. It is weird, it doesn't get all the reviews and I'm not sure on why 🤔. It is only getting 4 reviews |
For some reason the API is not registering most of the reviews. You can try it in your own terminal This returns a JSON which
I found the issue. It is a problem with pagination. The api returns the first 30 reviews, and there are more than that in this PR (comments & request for change also count). I created paritytech/review-bot#102 to fix it. It will be my priority. |
…pgrade-from-2_0-to-3_0
/merge |
4e4da08
into
polkadot-fellows:main
Enabled Available commands
For more information see the documentation |
…vel (#2422) As suggested in this thread: polkadot-fellows/runtimes#87 (comment) We already have the `IsChildSystemParachain`, which may be used at relay chain, but it can't be used at a parachain level. So let's use `AllSiblingSystemParachains` for that. I was thinking about `AllSystemParachains`, but it may cause wrong impression that it can be used at a relay chain level. --------- Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <[email protected]>
Opening PR mostly for visibility - I expect #56 to be finished before, which would bump everything to v1.2 and then I'll convert this PR to v1.2 -> v1.3. In its current state, this PR does v1.0 -> v1.3 bump, although I've only been looking at v1.2 -> v1.3 changelog, so everything else just compiles.
TODOs left in this PR (which I'd like to address after #56 is finished):
[cargo upgrade --pinned --incompatible](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/commit/8df27a586b598d2f783b53cd62b127b8f8ac846a)
and only leave sdk crates bump;(maybe worth a separate PR) there's a lot of unused weight files in this repo - I'd like to remove itwill do it in a separate PR - tracked here: https://github.com/svyatonik/runtimes/tree/remove-unused-weight-files@liamaharon Can you, please, confirm that the paritytech/polkadot-sdk#1344 was necessary only for sdk CI fixes - that PR caught my eye when I was looking at 1.3 CHANGELOG and I was wondering if we need to do the same for Polkadot, Kusama and system parachains?