Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New job: run tests in parallel #241

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

New job: run tests in parallel #241

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

gforcada
Copy link
Member

@gforcada gforcada commented Oct 5, 2018

See #240

@Rotonen let me know if you want me to keep tuning it, or feel free to work on it yourself.

The job is already up jenkins: https://jenkins.plone.org/view/Experimental/

Rotonen
Rotonen previously requested changes Oct 5, 2018
jobs/scripts/parallel-tests.sh Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
jobs/scripts/parallel-tests.sh Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
jobs/scripts/parallel-tests.sh Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
jobs/jobs.yml Show resolved Hide resolved
jobs/scripts/parallel-tests.sh Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
jobs/scripts/parallel-tests.sh Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@gforcada gforcada dismissed Rotonen’s stale review October 6, 2018 09:17

all changes applied

export PATH="/usr/lib/chromium-browser:$PATH"
export ROBOT_BROWSER=chrome

xvfb-run -a --server-args='-screen 0 1920x1200x24' bin/test --all -j 6 --xml
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cross-posting from #244

We'll rather split this so that we'll make the non-robot ones parallel first.

Also, can the -j flag get its parallelity from {weight}? This way we could use -j everywhere and set up {weight} 1 for everything and then bump things up one by one where we see they already run.

@gforcada gforcada closed this Dec 1, 2019
@gforcada gforcada deleted the parallel-tests branch December 1, 2019 14:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants