Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

If we say two, the list should be of... #653

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 4, 2016
Merged

If we say two, the list should be of... #653

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 4, 2016

Conversation

gforcada
Copy link
Member

@gforcada gforcada commented Jul 3, 2016

Fixes: #

Improves:

Changes proposed in this pull request:

  • minor nitpick on a list

@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ Plone has two kind of content types subsystems:

* :doc:`Dexterity </develop/plone/content/dexterity>`-based (new)

* See also Plomino (later in this document).
See also Plomino (later in this document).
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For the ones only looking at the diff, above the list there is a sentence saying Plone has two kind of content types, well, the list had three items :-)

@gforcada
Copy link
Member Author

gforcada commented Jul 3, 2016

It should be backported to 5.0 branch I guess.

@jensens jensens merged commit 418d101 into 5.1 Jul 4, 2016
@jensens jensens deleted the gforcada-patch-3 branch July 4, 2016 07:55
@gforcada
Copy link
Member Author

gforcada commented Jul 4, 2016

@jensens thanks for merging I manually cherry-picked it into 5.0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants