Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

planner: refactor some code of binding cache #58504

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 24, 2024

Conversation

qw4990
Copy link
Contributor

@qw4990 qw4990 commented Dec 24, 2024

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: ref #51347

Problem Summary: planner: refactor some code of binding cache

What changed and how does it work?

planner: refactor some code of binding cache

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No need to test
    • I checked and no code files have been changed.

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/planner SIG: Planner size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Dec 24, 2024
Copy link

tiprow bot commented Dec 24, 2024

Hi @qw4990. Thanks for your PR.

PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with /ok-to-test in this repo meaning untrusted PR authors can never trigger tests themselves. Collaborators can still trigger tests on the PR using /test all.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

}

useBinding := enableUseBinding && isStmtNode && match
if sessVars.StmtCtx.EnableOptimizerDebugTrace {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Remove to keep the code simple since no one is using OptimizerDebugTrace.

@hawkingrei
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the ok-to-test Indicates a PR is ready to be tested. label Dec 24, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 24, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 97.91667% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 74.8944%. Comparing base (a21c95b) to head (758b0a6).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             master     #58504        +/-   ##
================================================
+ Coverage   73.5387%   74.8944%   +1.3556%     
================================================
  Files          1681       1726        +45     
  Lines        464263     472548      +8285     
================================================
+ Hits         341413     353912     +12499     
+ Misses       102025      96351      -5674     
- Partials      20825      22285      +1460     
Flag Coverage Δ
integration 49.2016% <79.1666%> (?)
unit 72.2928% <97.9166%> (-0.0127%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components Coverage Δ
dumpling 52.6910% <ø> (ø)
parser ∅ <ø> (∅)
br 61.6507% <ø> (+15.8762%) ⬆️

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. label Dec 24, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@lance6716 lance6716 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

for domain part

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the approved label Dec 24, 2024
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Dec 24, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: AilinKid, lance6716, winoros

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added lgtm and removed needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. labels Dec 24, 2024
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Dec 24, 2024

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

  • 2024-12-24 09:32:53.347764917 +0000 UTC m=+1554163.436567458: ☑️ agreed by AilinKid.
  • 2024-12-24 09:54:57.533777107 +0000 UTC m=+1555487.622579650: ☑️ agreed by winoros.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot merged commit 457dcc6 into pingcap:master Dec 24, 2024
26 checks passed
Copy link
Member

@hawkingrei hawkingrei left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Member

@hawkingrei hawkingrei left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, although it has been merged.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved lgtm ok-to-test Indicates a PR is ready to be tested. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/planner SIG: Planner size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants