-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
planner: costs of Selection operators from DataSources are not accumulated #36243
Labels
epic/cost-model
the optimizer cost model
sig/planner
SIG: Planner
type/enhancement
The issue or PR belongs to an enhancement.
Comments
qw4990
added
type/enhancement
The issue or PR belongs to an enhancement.
sig/planner
SIG: Planner
epic/cost-model
the optimizer cost model
labels
Jul 15, 2022
For safety, I'll just fix it in cost model ver2 and keep it unchanged in ver1. |
12 tasks
ti-chi-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 15, 2022
12 tasks
ti-chi-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 28, 2022
12 tasks
ti-chi-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 30, 2022
This was referenced Oct 8, 2022
ti-chi-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 9, 2022
12 tasks
ti-chi-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 9, 2022
12 tasks
ti-chi-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 10, 2022
12 tasks
ti-chi-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 11, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
epic/cost-model
the optimizer cost model
sig/planner
SIG: Planner
type/enhancement
The issue or PR belongs to an enhancement.
Enhancement
As you can see above, Selection_7 has the same cost with TableReader_6, which is not correct.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: