Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Give up liveness slashing #2254

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

s0me0ne-unkn0wn
Copy link
Contributor

@s0me0ne-unkn0wn s0me0ne-unkn0wn commented Nov 9, 2023

In accordance with #1964, we give up liveness slashing. The first step is to always return zero offense threshold. This will be followed up by removing the im-online pallet entirely.

@s0me0ne-unkn0wn s0me0ne-unkn0wn requested review from a team and ordian November 9, 2023 13:50
@s0me0ne-unkn0wn s0me0ne-unkn0wn added the T2-pallets This PR/Issue is related to a particular pallet. label Nov 9, 2023
@paritytech-cicd-pr
Copy link

The CI pipeline was cancelled due to failure one of the required jobs.
Job name: test-linux-stable 2/3
Logs: https://gitlab.parity.io/parity/mirrors/polkadot-sdk/-/jobs/4274022

@bkchr
Copy link
Member

bkchr commented Nov 9, 2023

I don't get why we need this pr. Why are we not just remove the pallet from the runtime?

@juangirini
Copy link
Contributor

I don't get why we need this pr. Why are we not just remove the pallet from the runtime?

I will adhere to this. Do we really need to change this pallet functionality for a particular use case that can be achieved by just not using it?

@bkchr
Copy link
Member

bkchr commented Nov 13, 2023

Yeah. I also don't like this and I really don't see any reason. I'm going to close this for the other pr that just removes the stuff.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
T2-pallets This PR/Issue is related to a particular pallet.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants