Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Companion for Bridges V2 - relay client part #2988

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jun 14, 2024
Merged

Conversation

bkontur
Copy link
Contributor

@bkontur bkontur commented May 14, 2024

Updates polkadot-sdk version aligned to paritytech/polkadot-sdk#4494

TODO

Questions

  • Do we need more testing for client V2 stuff? If so, how/what is the ultimate test?

@bkontur bkontur force-pushed the bridges-v2-relay branch from 81a1629 to bd29db0 Compare May 23, 2024 08:05
@bkontur bkontur changed the title BridgesV2 relay part Companion for Bridges V2 - relay client part May 23, 2024
@bkontur bkontur self-assigned this May 23, 2024
@acatangiu
Copy link
Collaborator

Do we need more testing for client V2 stuff? If so, how/what is the ultimate test?

running it on Rococo<>Westend for a while should give us enough coverage

@bkontur bkontur force-pushed the bridges-v2-relay branch from d1e9f66 to 092dc07 Compare May 30, 2024 10:22
@bkontur
Copy link
Contributor Author

bkontur commented May 30, 2024

relayer with client-V2 redeployed for Rococo/Westend: https://gitlab.parity.io/parity/mirrors/parity-bridges-common/-/jobs/6350508

https://grafana.teleport.parity.io/explore?schemaVersion=1&panes=%7B%22zm8%22:%7B%22datasource%22:%22P03E52D76DFE188C3%22,%22queries%22:%5B%7B%22refId%22:%22A%22,%22expr%22:%22%7Bcontainer%3D%5C%22bridges-common-relay%5C%22%7D%22,%22queryType%22:%22range%22,%22datasource%22:%7B%22type%22:%22loki%22,%22uid%22:%22P03E52D76DFE188C3%22%7D,%22editorMode%22:%22code%22%7D%5D,%22range%22:%7B%22from%22:%22now-1h%22,%22to%22:%22now%22%7D%7D%7D&orgId=1

@svyatonik

2024-05-30 13:03:20	ERROR jsonrpsee_core::client::async_client [backend]: Networking or low-level protocol error: WebSocket connection error: connection closed
2024-05-30 13:03:20	DEBUG bridge best finalized headers headers stream of BridgeHubWestend has returned `None`. It may need to be restarted
2024-05-30 13:03:20	ERROR jsonrpsee_core::client::async_client [backend]: Networking or low-level protocol error: WebSocket connection error: connection closed
2024-05-30 13:03:20	DEBUG bridge best headers headers stream of BridgeHubRococo has returned `None`. It may need to be restarted
2024-05-30 13:03:20	ERROR jsonrpsee_core::client::async_client [backend]: Networking or low-level protocol error: WebSocket connection error: connection closed
2024-05-30 13:03:20	DEBUG bridge GRANDPA justifications stream of Westend has returned `None`. It may need to be restarted
2024-05-30 13:03:20	DEBUG bridge Background task of subscription broadcaster for GRANDPA justifications stream of Westend has stopped: stream has finished
2024-05-30 13:03:20	DEBUG bridge best finalized headers headers stream of Westend has returned `None`. It may need to be restarted
2024-05-30 13:03:23	[Rococo_to_BridgeHubWestend_EquivocationDetection] ERROR bridge Could not read best finalized header number from BridgeHubWestend: ChannelError("Background task of BridgeHubWestend client has exited with result: Err(ChannelError(\"Finalized headers subscription for BridgeHubWestend has finished\"))")
2024-05-30 13:03:23	[Rococo_to_BridgeHubWestend_EquivocationDetection] INFO bridge Connecting to BridgeHubWestend node at wss://westend-bridge-hub-rpc.polkadot.io:443
2024-05-30 13:03:26	[Westend_to_BridgeHubRococo_EquivocationDetection] ERROR bridge Could not read best finalized header number from BridgeHubRococo: ChannelError("Background task of BridgeHubRococo client has exited with result: Err(ChannelError(\"Mandatory best headers subscription for BridgeHubRococo has finished\"))")
2024-05-30 13:03:26	[Westend_to_BridgeHubRococo_EquivocationDetection] INFO bridge Connecting to BridgeHubRococo node at wss://rococo-bridge-hub-rpc.polkadot.io:443
2024-05-30 13:03:58	[Westend_to_BridgeHubRococo_EquivocationDetection] TRACE bridge Read 1 finality proofs from Westend finality stream for headers in range [Some(21048090); Some(21048090)]
2024-05-30 13:03:59	[Rococo_to_BridgeHubWestend_EquivocationDetection] TRACE bridge Read 12 finality proofs from Rococo finality stream for headers in range [Some(10671149); Some(10671160)]
2024-05-30 13:04:11	[Westend_to_BridgeHubRococo_EquivocationDetection] WARN bridge Westend finality proofs stream is being started / restarted
2024-05-30 13:04:11	[Westend_to_BridgeHubRococo_EquivocationDetection] ERROR bridge Failed to subscribe to Westend justifications: ChannelError("`try_send` has failed: Closed(..)")
2024-05-30 13:04:11	[Westend_to_BridgeHubRococo_EquivocationDetection] ERROR bridge Could not connect to the Westend `FinalityProofsStream`: ChannelError("`try_send` has failed: Closed(..)")
2024-05-30 13:04:11	[Westend_to_BridgeHubRococo_EquivocationDetection] INFO bridge Connecting to Westend node at wss://westend-rpc.polkadot.io:443
2024-05-30 13:04:12	[Rococo_to_BridgeHubWestend_EquivocationDetection] TRACE bridge Read 2 finality proofs from Rococo finality stream for headers in range [Some(10671161); Some(10671162)]
2024-05-30 13:04:23	[Westend_to_BridgeHubRococo_EquivocationDetection] WARN bridge Westend finality proofs stream is being started / restarted

@svyatonik
Copy link
Contributor

You're a bit out of the loop here, @bkontur :) We now use containers with names headers-a, headers-b, parachains-a, parachains-b, messages-a, messages-b. See e.g.: https://github.com/svyatonik/bridge-troubleshooting?tab=readme-ov-file#exploring-relayer-logs-online. E.g.: https://grafana.teleport.parity.io/explore?schemaVersion=1&panes=%7B%22yph%22%3A%7B%22datasource%22%3A%22P03E52D76DFE188C3%22%2C%22queries%22%3A%5B%7B%22refId%22%3A%22A%22%2C%22expr%22%3A%22%7Bpod%3D%7E%5C%22bridges-common-relay%2F.*%5C%22%2C+container%3D%5C%22headers-a%5C%22%7D%22%2C%22queryType%22%3A%22range%22%2C%22datasource%22%3A%7B%22type%22%3A%22loki%22%2C%22uid%22%3A%22P03E52D76DFE188C3%22%7D%2C%22editorMode%22%3A%22builder%22%7D%5D%2C%22range%22%3A%7B%22from%22%3A%22now-5m%22%2C%22to%22%3A%22now%22%7D%7D%7D&orgId=1

The logs you show are from the equivocation detection, which is using some old relayer version - I think we should talk to devops to also include it into our auto deployment step. Probably @serban300 could help here?

The issues from the log are caused by that:

2024-05-30 14:05:38.963	
ERROR jsonrpsee_core::client::async_client [backend]: Networking or low-level protocol error: WebSocket connection error: connection closed

Which is normal

Also (imho) it'd be better to have release when we deploy something on any chain - it'll make it easier to track relayer version/patches/... But you could go without that - that's jsut my opinion :)

@bkontur
Copy link
Contributor Author

bkontur commented May 30, 2024

You're a bit out of the loop here, @bkontur :) We now use containers with names headers-a, headers-b, parachains-a, parachains-b, messages-a, messages-b.

Yes, not my best day, focusing on too many things at once :)

The logs you show are from the equivocation detection, which is using some old relayer version - I think we should talk to devops to also include it into our auto deployment step. Probably @serban300 could help here?

Will do: #3005

Also (imho) it'd be better to have release when we deploy something on any chain - it'll make it easier to track relayer version/patches/... But you could go without that - that's jsut my opinion :)

Yes, I will try to do a normal release next time. I thought that we wanted to redeploy client-V2 just from the branch and not from the master, once it will work for at least one week, we could merge to polkadot-sdk client-v2 and create release and redeploy Ro/We and P/K.

Anyway, looks like the new relayer with client V2 is working, at least I see 4 relayed message around 20:00, I didn't check logs yet, I will check next week. Also with new client-v2 I want to do: #3004

github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit to paritytech/polkadot-sdk that referenced this pull request Jun 14, 2024
Contains mainly changes/nits/refactors related to the relayer code
(`client-substrate` and `lib-substrate-relay`) migrated from the Bridges
V2 [branch](#4427).

Relates to:
paritytech/parity-bridges-common#2976
Companion: paritytech/parity-bridges-common#2988


## TODO
- [x] fix comments

## Questions
- [x] Do we need more testing for client V2 stuff? If so, how/what is
the ultimate test? @svyatonik
- [x] check
[comment](#4494 (comment))
for more testing

---------

Co-authored-by: Svyatoslav Nikolsky <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Serban Iorga <[email protected]>
@bkontur bkontur marked this pull request as ready for review June 14, 2024 12:48
@bkontur bkontur merged commit fac3c0a into master Jun 14, 2024
14 checks passed
@bkontur bkontur deleted the bridges-v2-relay branch June 14, 2024 12:52
TarekkMA pushed a commit to moonbeam-foundation/polkadot-sdk that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2024
Contains mainly changes/nits/refactors related to the relayer code
(`client-substrate` and `lib-substrate-relay`) migrated from the Bridges
V2 [branch](paritytech#4427).

Relates to:
paritytech/parity-bridges-common#2976
Companion: paritytech/parity-bridges-common#2988


## TODO
- [x] fix comments

## Questions
- [x] Do we need more testing for client V2 stuff? If so, how/what is
the ultimate test? @svyatonik
- [x] check
[comment](paritytech#4494 (comment))
for more testing

---------

Co-authored-by: Svyatoslav Nikolsky <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Serban Iorga <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants