Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[jsonrpsee root crate]: more configurations for internal crates through feature flags. #271

Closed
Tracked by #416
niklasad1 opened this issue Apr 15, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by #494
Closed
Tracked by #416

[jsonrpsee root crate]: more configurations for internal crates through feature flags. #271

niklasad1 opened this issue Apr 15, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by #494

Comments

@niklasad1
Copy link
Member

niklasad1 commented Apr 15, 2021 •
edited
Loading

  • Make it possible to just include a specific server or client, currently we include on all transport behind the features server and client, see add jsonrpsee root crate #260 (comment)_ for further information
@niklasad1 niklasad1 changed the title [jsonrpsee root crate]: more configurations for internal crates. [jsonrpsee root crate]: more configurations for internal crates through feature flags. Apr 15, 2021
@niklasad1 niklasad1 mentioned this issue Apr 20, 2021
Merged
@niklasad1 niklasad1 mentioned this issue Apr 28, 2021
Merged
@dvdplm dvdplm mentioned this issue Jul 14, 2021
Closed
17 tasks
@dvdplm
Copy link
Contributor

dvdplm commented Jul 14, 2021

I have doubts about whether we should continue supporting tokio 0.2.

@niklasad1
Copy link
Member Author

I agree that we should deprecate tokio 0.2 in the next release, so maybe we could continue support tokio 0.2 in jsonrpsee v0.3 or something

@pedromfedricci pedromfedricci mentioned this issue Oct 1, 2021
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Improve feature configuration pedromfedricci/jsonrpsee
2 participants
@dvdplm @niklasad1