Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 25, 2021. It is now read-only.

[new-rule] Added new invalid-void rule #4736

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Jul 6, 2019
Merged

[new-rule] Added new invalid-void rule #4736

merged 15 commits into from
Jul 6, 2019

Conversation

timocov
Copy link
Contributor

@timocov timocov commented May 21, 2019 •
edited
Loading

PR checklist

Overview of change:

Added new rule no-invalid-void which fails on every "invalid" usage of the void type.

CHANGELOG.md entry:

[new-rule] no-invalid-void

JoshuaKGoldberg
JoshuaKGoldberg suggested changes May 25, 2019
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Implementation generally looks good: some comments around semantics please!

src/rules/noInvalidVoidRule.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/rules/noInvalidVoidRule.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/rules/noInvalidVoidRule.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/rules/noInvalidVoidRule.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/rules/noInvalidVoidRule.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
JoshuaKGoldberg
JoshuaKGoldberg suggested changes Jun 1, 2019
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking good so far - mostly just interested in expanding the test coverage, since there are a lot of potential edge cases.

test/rules/invalid-void/test.ts.lint Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/rules/invalid-void/test.ts.lint Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/rules/invalidVoidRule.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/rules/invalidVoidRule.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@timocov timocov changed the title [new-rule] Added new no-invalid-void rule [new-rule] Added new invalid-void rule Jun 16, 2019
@timocov
Copy link
Contributor Author

timocov commented Jul 1, 2019

@JoshuaKGoldberg can you please take a look? Do I need to do fix something else?

@JoshuaKGoldberg
Copy link
Contributor

Planning on looking at pending PRs this week!

JoshuaKGoldberg
JoshuaKGoldberg suggested changes Jul 4, 2019
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Almost there 🙏 I promise!

src/language/rule/abstractRule.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
@timocov
Copy link
Contributor Author

timocov commented Jul 6, 2019

There is CI error, but it looks like the master is failed too.

JoshuaKGoldberg
JoshuaKGoldberg approved these changes Jul 6, 2019
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great to me. Thanks so much for sticking through the PR reviews @timocov! 🚀

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg merged commit aa2af99 into palantir:master Jul 6, 2019
@timocov timocov deleted the no-invalid-void-rule branch July 6, 2019 14:37
@timocov
Copy link
Contributor Author

timocov commented Jul 6, 2019

🕺 thank you @JoshuaKGoldberg

@adidahiya adidahiya mentioned this pull request Aug 20, 2019
Merged
@buu700
Copy link
Contributor

buu700 commented Sep 7, 2019

@timocov, is it expected that this complains about types like Promise<void>, and if so is Promise<undefined> the recommended style?

@timocov
Copy link
Contributor Author

timocov commented Sep 8, 2019

Hey @buu700, I don't think that it was intended and I don't think that Promise<undefined> is what I suggest to use instead either. For me, we should add exception for Promise<void> case (and PromiseLike<void> as well). @JoshuaKGoldberg what do you think?

@adidahiya
Copy link
Contributor

@buu700 @timocov see #4832

@buu700
Copy link
Contributor

buu700 commented Sep 8, 2019

Whoops, sorry about the duplicate report, but thanks for the link!

@JoshuaKGoldberg
Copy link
Contributor

Yup, this was an error on my end for not noticing in review. Updated the fix PR. It should be in soon

@snyk-bot snyk-bot mentioned this pull request Oct 11, 2019
Merged
@snyk-bot snyk-bot mentioned this pull request Oct 26, 2019
Open
@snyk-bot snyk-bot mentioned this pull request Nov 15, 2019
Open
@snyk-bot snyk-bot mentioned this pull request Dec 15, 2019
Open
@snyk-bot snyk-bot mentioned this pull request Feb 19, 2020
Merged
This was referenced Mar 18, 2020
Closed
Open
Open
Open
Closed
@snyk-bot snyk-bot mentioned this pull request Mar 31, 2020
Open
@snyk-bot snyk-bot mentioned this pull request Apr 12, 2020
Closed
@snyk-bot snyk-bot mentioned this pull request Apr 22, 2020
Open
@dependabot dependabot bot mentioned this pull request Mar 15, 2021
Closed
@PropTekCTO PropTekCTO mentioned this pull request May 31, 2024
Open
@christian-thiel-webcom christian-thiel-webcom mentioned this pull request Aug 10, 2024
Open
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Reviewers

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
PR: waiting for author
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

New no-invalid-void rule
4 participants
@timocov @JoshuaKGoldberg @buu700 @adidahiya