Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

create rocksdb guide #779

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 24, 2022
Merged

create rocksdb guide #779

merged 3 commits into from
Jan 24, 2022

Conversation

clemensgg
Copy link
Contributor

re-open against correct branch

@ValarDragon
Copy link
Member

Can instructions be linked to for state syncing in here as well?

Copy link
Member

@faddat faddat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

awesome!

@ValarDragon I do not think they can be-- I haven't succeeded with the combination of rocks + ss yet on osmosis

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (docs@504100e). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             docs     #779   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   20.52%           
=======================================
  Files           ?      189           
  Lines           ?    25151           
  Branches        ?        0           
=======================================
  Hits            ?     5163           
  Misses          ?    19118           
  Partials        ?      870           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 504100e...f7f7c6e. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Member

@ValarDragon ValarDragon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah I see, @czarcas7ic pointed out to me that callum's patch only works for goleveldb atm

@ValarDragon ValarDragon merged commit 70e7198 into osmosis-labs:docs Jan 24, 2022
ValarDragon pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 7, 2022
* Added Algolia crawler settings and instructions.

* Added Algolia crawler settings and instructions. (Config & Readme)

* created example dropdowns in place of very busy page. Styl changes required

* footer no longer blank, different favicon than app

* rearranged cli section, took out mailing list function until implemented

* added asset page with ibc denoms and channels

* added module accounts with their addresses

* added history of changes to osmosis

* band-aid fix for testnet snapshot path issue

* github edit now takes you to docs branch instead of main

* pubkey update

* pubkey update

* Updated "Recommended readings" for IBC

* limitnofile update inf

* limitnofile to inf

* added limitnproc to inf

* added limitnproc to inf

* changed rpc

* rocksdb guide

* use 6.2.0

* correct from tx send to tx bank send

* swap exact amount out fix

* create rocksdb guide (#779)

* Update rocksdb.md

* Update rocksdb.md

* Update rocksdb.md

* need to reload journald now for logs to work

* created airdrop account export instructions

* state export time increase and 2> explanation

* added atom scan block explorer

* Updated docs build to execute on commits on the main branch that contain the tag: documentation. If the tag is not present, the docs will not build a new version.

* Updated docsBranch on the vue app for the "edit this page on Github" link.

* Remove Docs from osmosis's repo
Remove Doc's git action
Added a placer holder to let people know about the new repository.

Co-authored-by: Adam Tucker <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: clemensgg <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants