-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 607
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
candidate fix for v18 #6144
candidate fix for v18 #6144
Conversation
// In this case, remove redundant cases. | ||
// Namely: gauge empty OR gauge coins undistributable. | ||
if remainCoins.Empty() { | ||
ctx.Logger().Debug(fmt.Sprintf("gauge debug, this gauge is empty, why is it being ran %d. Balancer code", gauge.Id)) | ||
err := k.updateGaugePostDistribute(ctx, gauge, totalDistrCoins) | ||
return totalDistrCoins, err | ||
} | ||
|
||
// Remove some spam gauges, is state compatible. | ||
// If they're to pool 1 they can't distr at this small of a quantity. | ||
if remainCoins.Len() == 1 && remainCoins[0].Amount.LTE(sdk.NewInt(10)) && gauge.DistributeTo.Denom == "gamm/pool/1" && remainCoins[0].Denom != "uosmo" { | ||
ctx.Logger().Debug(fmt.Sprintf("gauge debug, this gauge is perceived spam, skipping %d", gauge.Id)) | ||
err := k.updateGaugePostDistribute(ctx, gauge, totalDistrCoins) | ||
return totalDistrCoins, err | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is the state-compatible fix to speed up incentive distribution. Makes sense to me to include it
@@ -295,6 +295,22 @@ func (k Keeper) clearKeysByPrefix(ctx sdk.Context, prefix []byte) { | |||
} | |||
} | |||
|
|||
func (k Keeper) RebuildAccumulationStoreForDenom(ctx sdk.Context, denom string) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
TODO: unit test this if time
* fix balancer liquidity breaking incentives * clean up * comment * added swap checks * check that LPing fails before the upgrade * fix test --------- Co-authored-by: Nicolas Lara <[email protected]>
@@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ func (k Keeper) distributeInternal( | |||
// Note: reason why we do millisecond conversion is because floats are non-deterministic. | |||
emissionRate := sdk.NewDecFromInt(remainAmountPerEpoch).QuoTruncate(sdk.NewDec(currentEpoch.Duration.Milliseconds()).QuoInt(sdk.NewInt(1000))) | |||
|
|||
ctx.Logger().Debug("distributeInternal, CreateIncentiveRecord NoLock gauge", "module", types.ModuleName, "gaugeId", gauge.Id, "poolId", pool.GetId(), "remainCoinPerEpoch", remainCoinPerEpoch, "height", ctx.BlockHeight()) | |||
ctx.Logger().Info("distributeInternal, CreateIncentiveRecord NoLock gauge", "module", types.ModuleName, "gaugeId", gauge.Id, "poolId", pool.GetId(), "remainCoinPerEpoch", remainCoinPerEpoch, "height", ctx.BlockHeight()) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This got converted to Info, it should be debug
@@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ func (k Keeper) distributeInternal( | |||
// Note: reason why we do millisecond conversion is because floats are non-deterministic. | |||
emissionRate := sdk.NewDecFromInt(remainAmountPerEpoch).QuoTruncate(sdk.NewDec(currentEpoch.Duration.Milliseconds()).QuoInt(sdk.NewInt(1000))) | |||
|
|||
ctx.Logger().Debug("distributeInternal, CreateIncentiveRecord NoLock gauge", "module", types.ModuleName, "gaugeId", gauge.Id, "poolId", pool.GetId(), "remainCoinPerEpoch", remainCoinPerEpoch, "height", ctx.BlockHeight()) | |||
ctx.Logger().Info("distributeInternal, CreateIncentiveRecord NoLock gauge", "module", types.ModuleName, "gaugeId", gauge.Id, "poolId", pool.GetId(), "remainCoinPerEpoch", remainCoinPerEpoch, "height", ctx.BlockHeight()) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ctx.Logger().Info("distributeInternal, CreateIncentiveRecord NoLock gauge", "module", types.ModuleName, "gaugeId", gauge.Id, "poolId", pool.GetId(), "remainCoinPerEpoch", remainCoinPerEpoch, "height", ctx.BlockHeight()) | |
ctx.Logger().Debug("distributeInternal, CreateIncentiveRecord NoLock gauge", "module", types.ModuleName, "gaugeId", gauge.Id, "poolId", pool.GetId(), "remainCoinPerEpoch", remainCoinPerEpoch, "height", ctx.BlockHeight()) |
@@ -66,7 +66,8 @@ func (k Keeper) RefreshIntermediaryDelegationAmounts(ctx sdk.Context) { | |||
if !found { | |||
// continue if current delegation is 0, in case its really a dust delegation | |||
// that becomes worth something after refresh. | |||
k.Logger(ctx).Info(fmt.Sprintf("Existing delegation not found for %s with %s during superfluid refresh."+ | |||
// TODO: We have a correct explanation for this in some github issue, lets amend this correctly. | |||
k.Logger(ctx).Debug(fmt.Sprintf("Existing delegation not found for %s with %s during superfluid refresh."+ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Spares our epoch logs 🙏
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tested this on a flow where we:
Make a v18 with broken accum store
Make a v19 with these changes
We saw that v18 caused the break as expected, and v19 fixed it.
Hence this as v19 should fix the mainnet problem.
The load bearing part of the fix is actually ran every testnet as InitGenesis
Closes: #XXX
What is the purpose of the change
Needs to be cherry-picked onto
main
Testing and Verifying
(Please pick one of the following options)
This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.
(or)
This change is already covered by existing tests, such as (please describe tests).
(or)
This change added tests and can be verified as follows:
(example:)
Documentation and Release Note
Unreleased
section ofCHANGELOG.md
?Where is the change documented?
x/{module}/README.md
)