Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(ProtoRev): Parameterizing Pool Type Information #5948
fix(ProtoRev): Parameterizing Pool Type Information #5948
Changes from 19 commits
063602c
e2b628e
c9b13cd
a706848
efa68d2
d25d53e
bde5c73
2f314fa
1ede81d
b0c92f3
1c78485
e50b0aa
64a6891
b8e3f1f
41b6e69
da72dd0
8cedc6e
7ef7106
85c64ca
d9ba32a
954269b
6f984fb
a45d681
a252cc1
6aa732e
33424a3
8e4c0e8
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we are renaming the proto field, we should depreciate this field and add a new one
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(Or reserve!)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just to clarify, add a note that this is deprecated and adding a new field?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added back the previous field with a note that it is being deprecated.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure if using a map is problematic for app hashing. We do no iterations on the map itself in the module. The primary use case is determining the number of pool weight of a given cosmwasm pool (which may vary across applications which is why its mapped to contract addresses).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ValarDragon can you verify the safety of this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We had instances where we tried to use maps quite a while ago, I think the decision back then was to try avoid using maps for extra safety, would it be possible to change it so tht we use repeated structs instead here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
got it. ty for confirming