Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[CL]: Increase min tick past canonical tick range #5551
[CL]: Increase min tick past canonical tick range #5551
Changes from 11 commits
4679405
f34cbaf
a9de3ef
4984fd4
8b3670d
3471bfb
1bea678
8675792
28409d2
b84aef2
bb6d2b9
aca6f22
a1b7c5c
749212c
bc6a4e5
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are you explaining being off by one compared to the Wolfram calculation?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah yes sorry – the expected output is bankers rounded instead of truncated due to
GetLiquidityFromAmounts
being bankers rounded. This does not pose any security risks as the balance is still deducted from the caller.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does this title reflect this test case? I think the previous one might have been incorrect as well right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for flagging this, fixed
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why is this removed? Is there a replacement for these test vectors?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The notion of canonical price ticks no longer exist, so these vectors no longer make sense. All the test vectors added relating to the behavior in ticks surrounding the new MinTick ensure the appropriate properties hold.