Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: expect single synthetic lock per native lock ID #5265
fix: expect single synthetic lock per native lock ID #5265
Changes from 3 commits
9d9f731
95e1f46
12707bc
571bc0e
b297f83
bbb4eaa
e0ecfea
dd70c9e
64f93dd
7bd3955
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggest avoiding breaking CLI and instead adding a new CLI
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added back the old CLI cmd and added deprecated in the description 7bd3955
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we are directly using key -value pair I think we should implement this without using iterators
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Removed iterator here e0ecfea
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
After looking into this, I don't think we can do this without a large refactor / state migration. We are currently keying by lockID and synthDenom, which is why we need to use the iterator. We absolutely do not need the synthDenom in the key, but if we removed it, we would need to do a state migration of all currently existing state entires.
I am going to revert back to the iterator method, but will wait for an ack on this before merging @mattverse
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No longer needed. We use DeleteSyntheticLockup directly now since we never expect multiple synthLocks anymore