-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 607
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add initial whitelist for Stargate Query #2619
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
30 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0835673
Add stargate queries
mattverse 3d5b97c
Fix test
mattverse 9dd65ff
Remove initial whitelist queries
mattverse 344b1c1
Add initial bindings, change names
mattverse 746c4af
Remove cosmos protos
mattverse b13bff2
Fix lint
mattverse eb216a1
Update wasm binary
mattverse 55a9668
Revert "Update wasm binary"
mattverse ab9adc6
Bez's review
mattverse d8d2013
Add test cases
mattverse 9871ddf
Remove logs
mattverse ba40941
WIP: return json marshalled response
mattverse 2498529
Add Test Case
mattverse 8ff9dbb
Merge branch 'main' into mattverse/test-json-marshalling
mattverse 3681fac
Add changelog
mattverse c28e94e
Modify Changelog
mattverse 36ab5d7
Normalize -> ProtoToJson
mattverse 7e148a4
Merge branch 'main' into mattverse/test-json-marshalling
mattverse 3957854
Fix merge conflict
mattverse 204f20a
Add stargate querier test
mattverse 49f709d
Add alot more test cases
mattverse 1e6a842
Add test case for breaking grpc querier
mattverse 18499bf
Update wasmbinding/query_plugin_test.go
mattverse 0ad85d4
code review from upstream
mattverse 4ffac7b
Add initial Stargate whitelist
mattverse 4206c57
Fix lint
mattverse e6c13c6
Fix test
mattverse 0e3543c
Update wasmbinding/stargate_whitelist.go
ValarDragon ac14ce3
Update wasmbinding/stargate_whitelist.go
ValarDragon c2f5554
Merge branch 'main' into mattverse/initial-stargate-queries
mattverse File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wish there was a way to infer these w/o hard-coding them :-/
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah agreed, lets make an issue to ideate/ follow-up. I think theres some magic happening in the proto-grpc backend / RPC service, that we should be able to expose some code re-use from to eliminate this in the future.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
#2627
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This should be possible with the chnages being done in the sdk to support deterministic queries.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hi @marbar3778, can you give me the link about the changes you said, thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
cosmos/cosmos-sdk#13041