-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 608
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Apptesting: Change Interface to Struct #1046
Conversation
@ValarDragon this is just a draft as of now, can you review and see if this was similar to the approach you were thinking of? |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1046 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 20.60% 20.60%
=======================================
Files 193 193
Lines 25237 25237
=======================================
Hits 5199 5199
Misses 19084 19084
Partials 954 954 Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! I like the struct approach much more than the initial interface idea
* Initial Commit * Delete unnecessary lines * Embed suite and keeper helper (cherry picked from commit b27b5b2)
* Initial Commit * Delete unnecessary lines * Embed suite and keeper helper (cherry picked from commit b27b5b2) Co-authored-by: Matt, Park <[email protected]>
Description
Extension for pull #1008.
We should compare this with the interface approach and compare on usability
For contributor use:
docs/
) or specification (x/<module>/spec/
)Unreleased
section inCHANGELOG.md
Files changed
in the Github PR explorer