developer-guide/02-projects/images: restructure "images" for relative links #121
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Hm, does this apply to other repos as well? I'm wondering if this would lead to a lot of unwanted structure/directories in the docs 🤔 I do agree though that having non-breaking links would be nice... |
|
Probably - what could be an other solution? Custom patch the links per repo by script? 🤔 |
The documentation of images will get relative links. This commit restructures the osbuild.github.io repo so the directory structure matches the "upstream" repo.
schuellerf
force-pushed
the
restructure-images-for-relative-links
branch
from
4e75b2d to
8e25766
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The documentation of "images" will get relative links.
This commit restructures the "
readme-listintegration" so the directory structure matches the "upstream" repo. Hence the links should not break.Now the links should not break, but there now is a "docs" subelement. This is not super nice but maybe ok for now?