Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(tree-select): solve the problem of tree attributes not being passed through #2659

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 16, 2024

Conversation

kagol
Copy link
Member

@kagol kagol commented Dec 16, 2024

PR

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • The commit message follows our Commit Message Guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other... Please describe:

What is the current behavior?

Issue Number: N/A

What is the new behavior?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Other information

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced configurability of the tiny-tree component through dynamic property binding.
  • Bug Fixes

    • No bug fixes were introduced in this update.

@kagol kagol added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 16, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 16, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the pc.vue file in the Vue tree select component, adding a new v-bind="treeOp" directive to the tiny-tree component. This change enables dynamic binding of properties from the treeOp object, allowing more flexible configuration of the tree select component without altering its underlying structure or existing props.

Changes

File Change Summary
packages/vue/src/tree-select/src/pc.vue Added v-bind="treeOp" to tiny-tree component template, enabling dynamic property binding

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • zzcr

Poem

🌳 A tree of options, bound with grace,
Tiny-tree now dances with new embrace
Dynamic props flow like woodland streams
Configurability bursts at the seams! 🐰✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8dd880d and 369a006.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/vue/src/tree-select/src/pc.vue (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
packages/vue/src/tree-select/src/pc.vue (2)

26-26: Review prop binding order and potential conflicts

The new v-bind="treeOp" directive might conflict with explicitly defined props. The current placement after explicit props means treeOp properties will override any conflicting explicit props, which may not be the intended behavior.

Let's analyze the component's usage to identify potential prop conflicts:

Consider:

  1. Moving v-bind="treeOp" before specific props if explicit props should take precedence
  2. Documenting which props can be overridden via treeOp
  3. Adding prop validation to prevent unintended overrides

26-26: Add tests and update documentation for tree operation binding

The new binding capability needs corresponding test coverage and documentation updates.

Let's check for existing tests and documentation:

Would you like help with:

  1. Creating test cases for the new tree operation binding?
  2. Updating the component documentation to reflect this new capability?

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

[e2e-test-warn]
The component to be tested is missing.

The title of the Pull request should look like "fix(vue-renderless): [action-menu, alert] fix xxx bug".

Please make sure you've read our contributing guide

@kagol kagol changed the title feat(tree-select): bind tree-op fix(tree-select): solve the problem of tree attributes not being passed through Dec 16, 2024
@kagol kagol added bug Something isn't working and removed enhancement New feature or request labels Dec 16, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added enhancement New feature or request bug Something isn't working and removed bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request labels Dec 16, 2024
@zzcr zzcr merged commit 926fb6e into dev Dec 16, 2024
16 of 27 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants