CNTRLPLANE-1: Update etcd test data for 1.32 release

[bertinatto]

This is intended to fix:

https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/logs/openshift-kubernetes-2147-ci-4.19-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial/1867506662982553600

[sig-api-machinery] API data in etcd should be stored at the correct location and version for all resources [Serial] [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial] expand_less 	15s
{  fail [github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/etcd/etcd_storage_path.go:482]: test failed:
no test data for resource.k8s.io/v1beta1, Kind=DeviceClass.  Please add a test for your new type to etcdStorageData.
no test data for resource.k8s.io/v1beta1, Kind=ResourceClaim.  Please add a test for your new type to etcdStorageData.
no test data for resource.k8s.io/v1beta1, Kind=ResourceClaimTemplate.  Please add a test for your new type to etcdStorageData.
no test data for resource.k8s.io/v1beta1, Kind=ResourceSlice.  Please add a test for your new type to etcdStorageData.
GVK for resource.k8s.io/v1alpha3, Kind=DeviceClass does not match, expected resource.k8s.io/v1alpha3, Kind=DeviceClass got resource.k8s.io/v1beta1, Kind=DeviceClass
GVK for resource.k8s.io/v1alpha3, Kind=ResourceClaim does not match, expected resource.k8s.io/v1alpha3, Kind=ResourceClaim got resource.k8s.io/v1beta1, Kind=ResourceClaim
GVK for resource.k8s.io/v1alpha3, Kind=ResourceClaimTemplate does not match, expected resource.k8s.io/v1alpha3, Kind=ResourceClaimTemplate got resource.k8s.io/v1beta1, Kind=ResourceClaimTemplate
GVK for resource.k8s.io/v1alpha3, Kind=ResourceSlice does not match, expected resource.k8s.io/v1alpha3, Kind=ResourceSlice got resource.k8s.io/v1beta1, Kind=ResourceSlice
etcd data does not match the types we saw:
seen but not in etcd data:
[
	resource.k8s.io/v1beta1, Resource=resourceslices 
	resource.k8s.io/v1beta1, Resource=resourceclaims 
	resource.k8s.io/v1beta1, Resource=resourceclaimtemplates 
	resource.k8s.io/v1beta1, Resource=deviceclasses]
Ginkgo exit error 1: exit with code 1}

/assign @dusk125

[openshift-ci-robot]

@bertinatto: This pull request references CNTRLPLANE-1 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the epic to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

/assign @dusk125

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@bertinatto: This pull request references CNTRLPLANE-1 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the epic to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

This is intended to fix:

https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/logs/openshift-kubernetes-2147-ci-4.19-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial/1867506662982553600

[sig-api-machinery] API data in etcd should be stored at the correct location and version for all resources [Serial] [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial] expand_less 	15s
{  fail [github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/etcd/etcd_storage_path.go:482]: test failed:
no test data for resource.k8s.io/v1beta1, Kind=DeviceClass.  Please add a test for your new type to etcdStorageData.
no test data for resource.k8s.io/v1beta1, Kind=ResourceClaim.  Please add a test for your new type to etcdStorageData.
no test data for resource.k8s.io/v1beta1, Kind=ResourceClaimTemplate.  Please add a test for your new type to etcdStorageData.
no test data for resource.k8s.io/v1beta1, Kind=ResourceSlice.  Please add a test for your new type to etcdStorageData.
GVK for resource.k8s.io/v1alpha3, Kind=DeviceClass does not match, expected resource.k8s.io/v1alpha3, Kind=DeviceClass got resource.k8s.io/v1beta1, Kind=DeviceClass
GVK for resource.k8s.io/v1alpha3, Kind=ResourceClaim does not match, expected resource.k8s.io/v1alpha3, Kind=ResourceClaim got resource.k8s.io/v1beta1, Kind=ResourceClaim
GVK for resource.k8s.io/v1alpha3, Kind=ResourceClaimTemplate does not match, expected resource.k8s.io/v1alpha3, Kind=ResourceClaimTemplate got resource.k8s.io/v1beta1, Kind=ResourceClaimTemplate
GVK for resource.k8s.io/v1alpha3, Kind=ResourceSlice does not match, expected resource.k8s.io/v1alpha3, Kind=ResourceSlice got resource.k8s.io/v1beta1, Kind=ResourceSlice
etcd data does not match the types we saw:
seen but not in etcd data:
[
  resource.k8s.io/v1beta1, Resource=resourceslices 
  resource.k8s.io/v1beta1, Resource=resourceclaims 
  resource.k8s.io/v1beta1, Resource=resourceclaimtemplates 
  resource.k8s.io/v1beta1, Resource=deviceclasses]
Ginkgo exit error 1: exit with code 1}

/assign @dusk125

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[dusk125]

/lgtm

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bertinatto, dusk125

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• test/extended/etcd/OWNERS [bertinatto,dusk125]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[bertinatto]

/payload-job-with-prs periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.19-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial openshift/kubernetes#2147

[openshift-ci]

@bertinatto: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

• periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.19-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/c3bbbbd0-b999-11ef-8485-4df525008c08-0

[bertinatto]

/retest-required

[openshift-trt]

Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: b74a53b

Job Name

Failure Risk

pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-aws-ovn-edge-zones

High [sig-instrumentation] Prometheus [apigroup:image.openshift.io] when installed on the cluster shouldn't report any alerts in firing state apart from Watchdog and AlertmanagerReceiversNotConfigured [Early][apigroup:config.openshift.io] [Skipped:Disconnected] [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] This test has passed 99.24% of 132 runs on release 4.19 [Architecture:amd64 FeatureSet:default Installer:ipi Network:ovn NetworkStack:ipv4 Platform:aws SecurityMode:default Topology:ha Upgrade:none] in the last week.

[openshift-ci-robot]

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD b7c61a7 and 2 for PR HEAD b74a53b in total

[openshift-ci]

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

[bertinatto]

/payload-job-with-prs periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.19-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial openshift/kubernetes#2147

[openshift-ci]

@bertinatto: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

• periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.19-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/487cdc20-b9bb-11ef-8f3b-2dffa7abea46-0

[openshift-ci]

@bertinatto: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-openstack-ovn	48ebd00	link	false	/test e2e-openstack-ovn
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn	48ebd00	link	false	/test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-aws-csi	48ebd00	link	false	/test e2e-aws-csi
ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-ovn-cmd	48ebd00	link	false	/test e2e-agnostic-ovn-cmd
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-kube-apiserver-rollout	48ebd00	link	false	/test e2e-aws-ovn-kube-apiserver-rollout
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node	48ebd00	link	false	/test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-serial	48ebd00	link	false	/test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-serial
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-upgrade	48ebd00	link	false	/test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-upgrade

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.