Add RTL code coverage waiver for some instances in FPU #2457
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Bee Nee Lim <[email protected]>
|
Thanks @dd-BeeNee. Hi @pascalgouedo, I recall discussing these "per-instance" coverage waivers in our weekly meeting. Are these the same ones that you mentioned? |
|
Yes |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Just a brief explanation for why this update: the RTL code coverage for these design modules are already fully covered in earlier reports (if we check file by file per 'Design Unit'). However on close look, some instances are not individually fully covering for each use. It is also due to how the information is displayed by the tools misleaded us when we scrub the coverage analysis by going thru 'Design Unit'.