Just adding another test case for behaviour clarity #842
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Changes Unknown when pulling 9f9a383 on list-test into ** on master**. |
DanG100
approved these changes
May 25, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
that unmarshalling to a regular unordered list using JSON doesn't overwrite untouched fields.
My intention is that writing to an ordered list WILL overwrite it, or actually will error out if one already exists since it is expected to receive the whole of the ordered list elements as a whole instead of in chunks. If we later decide this is not the right behaviour we can relax the constraint.