Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

src: fix handle leaks #7711

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 18, 2016
Merged

src: fix handle leaks #7711

merged 4 commits into from
Jul 18, 2016

Conversation

bnoordhuis
Copy link
Member

@bnoordhuis bnoordhuis commented Jul 13, 2016

@bnoordhuis bnoordhuis added c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. lts-watch-v4.x lib / src Issues and PRs related to general changes in the lib or src directory. labels Jul 13, 2016
@cjihrig
Copy link
Contributor

cjihrig commented Jul 13, 2016

LGTM pending CI

Environment* env = Environment::GetCurrent(isolate);
EscapableHandleScope handle_scope(env->isolate());
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you explain how this is leaky? Just out of interest.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Environment::GetCurrent() calls Isolate::GetCurrentContext() which creates a Local<Context> in the current handle scope, i.e., the scope of the caller.

@trevnorris
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM

@Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor

Are these commits squashable? Maybe add a note in the commit message explaining Rod's question for posterity

@bnoordhuis
Copy link
Member Author

They're distinct fixes, IMO. Also, explanations are (and were) in the commit logs...

@cjihrig
Copy link
Contributor

cjihrig commented Jul 14, 2016

That information is already in the commit message. I was wondering the same thing during review.

@addaleax
Copy link
Member

LGTM

@bnoordhuis
Copy link
Member Author

Fix handle leaks in Buffer::New() and Buffer::Copy() by creating the
handle scope before looking up the env with Environment::GetCurrent().

Environment::GetCurrent() calls v8::Isolate::GetCurrentContext(), which
creates a handle in the current scope, i.e., the scope created by the
caller of Buffer::New() or Buffer::Copy().

PR-URL: nodejs#7711
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <[email protected]>
Create a handle scope before performing a check that creates a handle,
otherwise the handle is leaked into the handle scope of the caller.

PR-URL: nodejs#7711
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <[email protected]>
Create a handle scope before performing a check that creates a handle,
otherwise the handle is leaked into the handle scope of the caller.

PR-URL: nodejs#7711
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <[email protected]>
API function callbacks run inside an implicit HandleScope.  We don't
need to explicitly create one and in fact introduce some unnecessary
overhead when we do.

PR-URL: nodejs#7711
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <[email protected]>
@bnoordhuis bnoordhuis closed this Jul 18, 2016
@bnoordhuis bnoordhuis deleted the fix-handle-leaks branch July 18, 2016 08:54
@bnoordhuis bnoordhuis merged commit 48c52d7 into nodejs:master Jul 18, 2016
@bnoordhuis
Copy link
Member Author

bnoordhuis commented Jul 18, 2016

The node-test-commit-plinux buildbots seem to be offline but everything else is green. Landed in c897d0b...48c52d7, thanks for the reviews.

evanlucas pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2016
Fix handle leaks in Buffer::New() and Buffer::Copy() by creating the
handle scope before looking up the env with Environment::GetCurrent().

Environment::GetCurrent() calls v8::Isolate::GetCurrentContext(), which
creates a handle in the current scope, i.e., the scope created by the
caller of Buffer::New() or Buffer::Copy().

PR-URL: #7711
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <[email protected]>
evanlucas pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2016
Create a handle scope before performing a check that creates a handle,
otherwise the handle is leaked into the handle scope of the caller.

PR-URL: #7711
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <[email protected]>
evanlucas pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2016
Create a handle scope before performing a check that creates a handle,
otherwise the handle is leaked into the handle scope of the caller.

PR-URL: #7711
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <[email protected]>
evanlucas pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2016
API function callbacks run inside an implicit HandleScope.  We don't
need to explicitly create one and in fact introduce some unnecessary
overhead when we do.

PR-URL: #7711
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <[email protected]>
evanlucas pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2016
Fix handle leaks in Buffer::New() and Buffer::Copy() by creating the
handle scope before looking up the env with Environment::GetCurrent().

Environment::GetCurrent() calls v8::Isolate::GetCurrentContext(), which
creates a handle in the current scope, i.e., the scope created by the
caller of Buffer::New() or Buffer::Copy().

PR-URL: #7711
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <[email protected]>
evanlucas pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2016
Create a handle scope before performing a check that creates a handle,
otherwise the handle is leaked into the handle scope of the caller.

PR-URL: #7711
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <[email protected]>
evanlucas pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2016
Create a handle scope before performing a check that creates a handle,
otherwise the handle is leaked into the handle scope of the caller.

PR-URL: #7711
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <[email protected]>
evanlucas pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2016
API function callbacks run inside an implicit HandleScope.  We don't
need to explicitly create one and in fact introduce some unnecessary
overhead when we do.

PR-URL: #7711
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit to MylesBorins/node that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2016
Fix handle leaks in Buffer::New() and Buffer::Copy() by creating the
handle scope before looking up the env with Environment::GetCurrent().

Environment::GetCurrent() calls v8::Isolate::GetCurrentContext(), which
creates a handle in the current scope, i.e., the scope created by the
caller of Buffer::New() or Buffer::Copy().

PR-URL: nodejs#7711
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit to MylesBorins/node that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2016
Create a handle scope before performing a check that creates a handle,
otherwise the handle is leaked into the handle scope of the caller.

PR-URL: nodejs#7711
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit to MylesBorins/node that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2016
Create a handle scope before performing a check that creates a handle,
otherwise the handle is leaked into the handle scope of the caller.

PR-URL: nodejs#7711
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit to MylesBorins/node that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2016
API function callbacks run inside an implicit HandleScope.  We don't
need to explicitly create one and in fact introduce some unnecessary
overhead when we do.

PR-URL: nodejs#7711
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <[email protected]>
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2016
Fix handle leaks in Buffer::New() and Buffer::Copy() by creating the
handle scope before looking up the env with Environment::GetCurrent().

Environment::GetCurrent() calls v8::Isolate::GetCurrentContext(), which
creates a handle in the current scope, i.e., the scope created by the
caller of Buffer::New() or Buffer::Copy().

PR-URL: #7711
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <[email protected]>
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2016
Create a handle scope before performing a check that creates a handle,
otherwise the handle is leaked into the handle scope of the caller.

PR-URL: #7711
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <[email protected]>
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2016
Create a handle scope before performing a check that creates a handle,
otherwise the handle is leaked into the handle scope of the caller.

PR-URL: #7711
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <[email protected]>
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2016
API function callbacks run inside an implicit HandleScope.  We don't
need to explicitly create one and in fact introduce some unnecessary
overhead when we do.

PR-URL: #7711
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 26, 2016
Fix handle leaks in Buffer::New() and Buffer::Copy() by creating the
handle scope before looking up the env with Environment::GetCurrent().

Environment::GetCurrent() calls v8::Isolate::GetCurrentContext(), which
creates a handle in the current scope, i.e., the scope created by the
caller of Buffer::New() or Buffer::Copy().

PR-URL: #7711
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 26, 2016
Create a handle scope before performing a check that creates a handle,
otherwise the handle is leaked into the handle scope of the caller.

PR-URL: #7711
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 26, 2016
Create a handle scope before performing a check that creates a handle,
otherwise the handle is leaked into the handle scope of the caller.

PR-URL: #7711
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 26, 2016
API function callbacks run inside an implicit HandleScope.  We don't
need to explicitly create one and in fact introduce some unnecessary
overhead when we do.

PR-URL: #7711
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <[email protected]>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Oct 26, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. lib / src Issues and PRs related to general changes in the lib or src directory.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants