Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

lib: convert signals to array before validation #54714

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 6, 2024

Conversation

jazelly
Copy link
Member

@jazelly jazelly commented Sep 2, 2024

Fixes: #54674

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

nodejs-github-bot commented Sep 2, 2024

Review requested:

  • @nodejs/crypto
  • @nodejs/web-standards

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added crypto Issues and PRs related to the crypto subsystem. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. labels Sep 2, 2024
@jazelly jazelly changed the title abort_controller: convert signals to array before validation lib: convert signals to array before validation Sep 2, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 2, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 90.00000% with 9 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 87.60%. Comparing base (981c701) to head (80b16d1).
Report is 252 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
lib/internal/webidl.js 88.31% 9 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #54714      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   87.61%   87.60%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         650      650              
  Lines      182835   182881      +46     
  Branches    35382    35397      +15     
==========================================
+ Hits       160185   160218      +33     
- Misses      15925    15930       +5     
- Partials     6725     6733       +8     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
lib/internal/abort_controller.js 97.90% <100.00%> (+0.03%) ⬆️
lib/internal/crypto/webidl.js 98.29% <100.00%> (+0.65%) ⬆️
lib/internal/webidl.js 94.57% <88.31%> (-1.30%) ⬇️

... and 33 files with indirect coverage changes

Copy link
Member

@mcollina mcollina left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

does this fix any wpts?

@KhafraDev
Copy link
Member

the WPTs don't usually test webidl validations because implementations are assumed to be using them for the dozens of specs they implement

Copy link
Member

@mcollina mcollina left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Copy link
Member

@mertcanaltin mertcanaltin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

lib/internal/webidl.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@jakecastelli jakecastelli added author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. web-standards Issues and PRs related to Web APIs labels Sep 3, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Sep 3, 2024
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@jakecastelli
Copy link
Member

jakecastelli commented Sep 3, 2024

osx failure on CI due to java.io.IOException: No space left on device (6h ago) however I also observed nodejs/jenkins-alerts#2785 (10h ago) mentioned The machine has now enough disk space 🙌

Other failures are most likely flaky tests, rerunning

update: rerun works on osx, seems the no space issue has been resolved.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@jakecastelli jakecastelli added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Sep 4, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Sep 4, 2024
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

nodejs-github-bot commented Sep 4, 2024

@aduh95 aduh95 added the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Sep 6, 2024
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Sep 6, 2024
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot merged commit 973144b into nodejs:main Sep 6, 2024
66 checks passed
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Landed in 973144b

aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 12, 2024
Co-authored-by: Jake Yuesong Li <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #54714
Fixes: #54674
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Matthew Aitken <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ethan Arrowood <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
@RafaelGSS RafaelGSS mentioned this pull request Sep 16, 2024
@targos targos added the dont-land-on-v20.x PRs that should not land on the v20.x-staging branch and should not be released in v20.x. label Sep 22, 2024
louwers pushed a commit to louwers/node that referenced this pull request Nov 2, 2024
Co-authored-by: Jake Yuesong Li <[email protected]>
PR-URL: nodejs#54714
Fixes: nodejs#54674
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Matthew Aitken <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ethan Arrowood <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
tpoisseau pushed a commit to tpoisseau/node that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2024
Co-authored-by: Jake Yuesong Li <[email protected]>
PR-URL: nodejs#54714
Fixes: nodejs#54674
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Matthew Aitken <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ethan Arrowood <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
@jazelly jazelly deleted the fix-abort-any branch November 25, 2024 22:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. crypto Issues and PRs related to the crypto subsystem. dont-land-on-v20.x PRs that should not land on the v20.x-staging branch and should not be released in v20.x. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. web-standards Issues and PRs related to Web APIs
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

AbortSignal.any does not work on all sequences