-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: reduce flakiness of test-runner-output
#51952
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
nodejs-github-bot
added
needs-ci
PRs that need a full CI run.
test
Issues and PRs related to the tests.
labels
Mar 3, 2024
MoLow
approved these changes
Mar 3, 2024
aduh95
added
author ready
PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started.
request-ci
Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR.
labels
Mar 3, 2024
aduh95
commented
Mar 3, 2024
aduh95
commented
Mar 3, 2024
MoLow
approved these changes
Mar 3, 2024
github-actions
bot
removed
the
request-ci
Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR.
label
Mar 3, 2024
atlowChemi
approved these changes
Mar 4, 2024
aduh95
added
commit-queue
Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions.
commit-queue-squash
Add this label to instruct the Commit Queue to squash all the PR commits into the first one.
labels
Mar 4, 2024
lpinca
approved these changes
Mar 4, 2024
tniessen
approved these changes
Mar 4, 2024
nodejs-github-bot
removed
the
commit-queue
Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions.
label
Mar 5, 2024
Landed in 16579d7 |
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 7, 2024
PR-URL: #51952 Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]>
cjihrig
added a commit
to cjihrig/node
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 18, 2024
This commit is similar to nodejs#51952. When the system is under load it is possible for these timeout tests to become flaky. We work around that by using a much longer setTimeout() in the test so that it is not racing against the test's timeout. But, we have to unref() such a large timeout. And, because test timeouts do not currently keep the event loop alive, we use a different setTimeout() for that purpose. Fixes: nodejs#52139 Refs: nodejs#52140
This was referenced Mar 18, 2024
nodejs-github-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 19, 2024
This commit is similar to #51952. When the system is under load it is possible for these timeout tests to become flaky. We work around that by using a much longer setTimeout() in the test so that it is not racing against the test's timeout. But, we have to unref() such a large timeout. And, because test timeouts do not currently keep the event loop alive, we use a different setTimeout() for that purpose. Fixes: #52139 Refs: #52140 PR-URL: #52146 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]>
richardlau
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 25, 2024
PR-URL: #51952 Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]>
richardlau
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 25, 2024
PR-URL: #51952 Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]>
Merged
rdw-msft
pushed a commit
to rdw-msft/node
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 26, 2024
PR-URL: nodejs#51952 Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]>
rdw-msft
pushed a commit
to rdw-msft/node
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 26, 2024
This commit is similar to nodejs#51952. When the system is under load it is possible for these timeout tests to become flaky. We work around that by using a much longer setTimeout() in the test so that it is not racing against the test's timeout. But, we have to unref() such a large timeout. And, because test timeouts do not currently keep the event loop alive, we use a different setTimeout() for that purpose. Fixes: nodejs#52139 Refs: nodejs#52140 PR-URL: nodejs#52146 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]>
marco-ippolito
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 2, 2024
This commit is similar to #51952. When the system is under load it is possible for these timeout tests to become flaky. We work around that by using a much longer setTimeout() in the test so that it is not racing against the test's timeout. But, we have to unref() such a large timeout. And, because test timeouts do not currently keep the event loop alive, we use a different setTimeout() for that purpose. Fixes: #52139 Refs: #52140 PR-URL: #52146 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]>
marco-ippolito
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 3, 2024
This commit is similar to #51952. When the system is under load it is possible for these timeout tests to become flaky. We work around that by using a much longer setTimeout() in the test so that it is not racing against the test's timeout. But, we have to unref() such a large timeout. And, because test timeouts do not currently keep the event loop alive, we use a different setTimeout() for that purpose. Fixes: #52139 Refs: #52140 PR-URL: #52146 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready
PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started.
commit-queue-squash
Add this label to instruct the Commit Queue to squash all the PR commits into the first one.
needs-ci
PRs that need a full CI run.
test
Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It was failing 1% of the times on my local machine. With that patch, I got no failures on 1000 runs.