Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

upgrade npm to 3.7.1 #5097

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

upgrade npm to 3.7.1 #5097

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

iarna
Copy link
Member

@iarna iarna commented Feb 5, 2016

This contains these releases:

https://github.com/npm/npm/releases/tag/v3.7.0
https://github.com/npm/npm/releases/tag/v3.7.1

Notable changes are:

  • Performance improvements
  • Support for git submodules

r: @Fishrock123
r: @zkat

@iarna iarna added the npm Issues and PRs related to the npm client dependency or the npm registry. label Feb 5, 2016
@MylesBorins
Copy link
Contributor

I'm getting some weirdness over here

npm ERR! code MODULE_NOT_FOUND

npm ERR! Cannot find module 'internal/util'

Eeek!

It seems like the tests on v5.x work as expected as do the tests at 76cb81b when it was last upgraded.
The previous commit with v3.6.0 is experiencing the same weirdness, so I think this is on our end.
Bisecting

@MylesBorins
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like it was 1124de2 which landed about 4 hours ago and it is semver major

¯_(ツ)_/¯

PR for reference #4525

/cc @thefourtheye @jasnell @ChALkeR @bnoordhuis

It looks like there was a search against the ecosystem, but perhaps not done against npm itself

#4530 (comment)

edit:

I just have to note how crazy it is the a deprecation that was supposed to happen in 2010 finally lands an hour before a release that it breaks... I'm without words

@ChALkeR
Copy link
Member

ChALkeR commented Feb 5, 2016

@thealphanerd, it should not fail, the API change probably had nothing to do with it.

Most probably something is re-executing source code of the fs module, monkey-patching it. Will take a look later today.

@MylesBorins
Copy link
Contributor

@ChALkeR my thoughts exactly. Seemed very odd that this would break it. npm is effectively broken on master right now

@ChALkeR
Copy link
Member

ChALkeR commented Feb 5, 2016

See:
#1898
#2025
#2026
#1941 (comment)

@ChALkeR
Copy link
Member

ChALkeR commented Feb 5, 2016

@thealphanerd 1124de2 introduced require('internal/util'), which is not requirable from the external code (i.e. not from the Node.js core), so anything that wraps fs module code, monkey-patches it and re-executes it (as graceful-fs was doing a while ago) is broken by that.

@MylesBorins
Copy link
Contributor

@ChALkeR should we be doing a try catch on that require?

edit: perhaps we can move this discussion to #4525

@ChALkeR
Copy link
Member

ChALkeR commented Feb 5, 2016

@thealphanerd Why? I think we decided against supporting monkey-patching core modules in that way. Some module required by npm should be fixed.

Could you give me a trace, please?

@MylesBorins
Copy link
Contributor

I was unaware of not supporting monkey-patching, but that is reasonable.

That being said This version of npm has some pretty important performance improvements. Do you think it makes sense to temporarily revert the offending change until the next release of npm which can perhaps fix this?

@ChALkeR
Copy link
Member

ChALkeR commented Feb 5, 2016

@thealphanerd See the issues and PRs I linked above in #5097 (comment) for history on this.

@thefourtheye
Copy link
Contributor

Okay. Actual problem is one of the npm's dependencies are still using older version of cmd-shim, which uses older, monkey-patched version of graceful-fs

Excerpt from npm-debug.log file generated when I ran make test-npm locally

258 verbose stack Error: Cannot find module 'internal/util'
258 verbose stack     at Function.Module._resolveFilename (module.js:339:15)
258 verbose stack     at Function.Module._load (module.js:290:25)
258 verbose stack     at Module.require (module.js:367:17)
258 verbose stack     at require (internal/module.js:16:19)
258 verbose stack     at evalmachine.<anonymous>:38:26
258 verbose stack     at Object.<anonymous> (/home/thefourtheye/git/io.js/test-npm/node_modules/cmd-shim/node_modules/graceful-fs/fs.js:11:1)
258 verbose stack     at Module._compile (module.js:417:34)
258 verbose stack     at Object.Module._extensions..js (module.js:426:10)
258 verbose stack     at Module.load (module.js:357:32)
258 verbose stack     at Function.Module._load (module.js:314:12)

Update:

On further investigation, npm itself is using cmd-shim@~2.0.1 and since there was no new release after merging npm/cmd-shim#14, npm still uses the monkey-patched graceful-fs (indirectly) and that is why this is failing. Because we don't allow userland modules to access modules in lib/internal and the older monkey-patched version of graceful-fs is trying to require internal/util. Probable fix is to have cmd-shim release a new version and then to have npm use the latest version of it.

@ChALkeR
Copy link
Member

ChALkeR commented Feb 5, 2016

/cc @nodejs/ctc
It seems we have #1898 again. Some historic discussion in #2026.

@MylesBorins
Copy link
Contributor

edit:
removed as I was totally off base, thanks @ChALkeR

@MylesBorins
Copy link
Contributor

/cc @isaacs

@ChALkeR
Copy link
Member

ChALkeR commented Feb 5, 2016

@thealphanerd, it doesn't.

@thefourtheye
Copy link
Contributor

Okay, updated the comment #5097 (comment) with some findings.

@ChALkeR
Copy link
Member

ChALkeR commented Feb 5, 2016

@nodejs/ctc My opinion here is that we should in fact fix 1124de2 on the Node.js side for now, but add an explicit warning there, for at least one major version (v6.x), so that everyone who monkey-patches fs in that way (e.g uses an old version of the graceful-fs module) will be notified of the problem and will get off it, because sudden breakage with a bogus error message could be confusing.

This does not cancel the fact that the problem should be fixed on cmd-shim/npm side, of course.

I will make a PR for that when I'll get home.

@Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor

Can we just remove lower versions of graceful-fs from the dep tree?

This was fixed ages ago in graceful-fs and I am not particularly sympathetic to it blatantly abusing the runtime code.

@ChALkeR
Copy link
Member

ChALkeR commented Feb 5, 2016

@Fishrock123 That has to be done, of course, I'm not suggesting leaving an old version of graceful-fs hanging there.

@iarna
Copy link
Member Author

iarna commented Feb 5, 2016

As soon as the updated cmd-shim is published I'll add a commit to this PR that updates it. (It'll be two weeks before it shows up in the version of npm being upstreamed directly.)

@Fishrock123 We can't just remove the deeper one's from the dep tree, w/o patching cmd-shim or we'd be shipping a version of npm that's marked as invalid when you do an npm ls -g.

@ChALkeR
Copy link
Member

ChALkeR commented Feb 5, 2016

Proposed solution:

  1. Fix this on npm side.
  2. Merge something like fs: add a temporary fix for re-evaluation support #5102 to give users a grace period in 6.x.

@Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor

@ChALkeR seems like an ok plan

@MylesBorins
Copy link
Contributor

I made a branch that reverts 1124de2 and applies b5362b5

I then used that build of node to run citgm.

https://ci.nodejs.org/job/thealphanerd-smoker/59/

edit: all failures are unrelated

ChALkeR added a commit to ChALkeR/io.js that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2016
This is needed to give users a grace period before actually breaking
modules that re-evaluate fs sources from context where internal modules
are not allowed, e.g. older version of graceful-fs module.

To be reverted in Node.js 7.0.

Fixes nodejs#5097, see also nodejs#1898, nodejs#2026, and nodejs#4525.
@MylesBorins
Copy link
Contributor

closing in for #5211

jasnell pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2016
This is needed to give users a grace period before actually breaking
modules that re-evaluate fs sources from context where internal modules
are not allowed, e.g. older version of graceful-fs module.

To be reverted in Node.js 7.0

Fixes: #5097, see also #1898, #2026, and #4525.
PR-URL: #5102
Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
stefanmb pushed a commit to stefanmb/node that referenced this pull request Feb 23, 2016
This is needed to give users a grace period before actually breaking
modules that re-evaluate fs sources from context where internal modules
are not allowed, e.g. older version of graceful-fs module.

To be reverted in Node.js 7.0

Fixes: nodejs#5097, see also nodejs#1898, nodejs#2026, and nodejs#4525.
PR-URL: nodejs#5102
Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
npm Issues and PRs related to the npm client dependency or the npm registry.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants