Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

esm: remove support for arrays in import internal method #48296

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 5, 2023
Merged

esm: remove support for arrays in import internal method #48296

merged 2 commits into from
Jun 5, 2023

Conversation

aduh95
Copy link
Contributor

@aduh95 aduh95 commented Jun 2, 2023 •
edited
Loading

This avoids initializing arrays that we never use, and simplifies the implementation overall.

This had a purpose before #43772, but now we load everything serially making the array creation superfluous.

@aduh95
esm: remove support for arrays in import internal method
1ab810b 
This avoids initializing arrays that we never use, and simplifies the
implementation overall.
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Review requested:

  • @nodejs/loaders
  • @nodejs/modules

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added esm Issues and PRs related to the ECMAScript Modules implementation. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. process Issues and PRs related to the process subsystem. labels Jun 2, 2023
@aduh95 aduh95 added author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. labels Jun 2, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jun 2, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/52057/

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/52058/

jlenon7
jlenon7 approved these changes Jun 2, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@jlenon7 jlenon7 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, much simpler to read the code.

@jlenon7 jlenon7 mentioned this pull request Jun 2, 2023
Merged
4 tasks
JakobJingleheimer
JakobJingleheimer approved these changes Jun 2, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@JakobJingleheimer JakobJingleheimer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch 🙂

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/52059/

@aduh95
Copy link
Contributor Author

aduh95 commented Jun 2, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Failures that seems to not be a flake, yet I don't see how it relates to this PR 🤔

not ok 106 parallel/test-child-process-pipe-dataflow
  ---
  duration_ms: 221.12800
  severity: fail
  exitcode: 1
  stack: |-
    node:assert:125
      throw new AssertionError(obj);
      ^
    
    AssertionError [ERR_ASSERTION]: Expected values to be strictly equal:
    + actual - expected
    
    + '130086'
    - '1048577'
        at process.<anonymous> (C:\workspace\node-test-binary-windows-js-suites\node\test\parallel\test-child-process-pipe-dataflow.js:71:12)
        at process.emit (node:events:523:35) {
      generatedMessage: true,
      code: 'ERR_ASSERTION',
      actual: '130086',
      expected: '1048577',
      operator: 'strictEqual'
    }
    
    Node.js v21.0.0-pre
  ...

EDIT: no it is a flake, it's failing on other jobs as well, taking it to its own issue.

@aduh95 aduh95 mentioned this pull request Jun 2, 2023
Open
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Jun 3, 2023
Open
33 tasks
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Jun 4, 2023
Open
30 tasks
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/52092/

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/52096/

@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Jun 5, 2023
Open
30 tasks
@aduh95 aduh95 added the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Jun 5, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Jun 5, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot merged commit 9f3466b into nodejs:main Jun 5, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Landed in 9f3466b

@aduh95 aduh95 deleted the fewer-arrays-import branch June 5, 2023 08:59
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2023
@aduh95 @targos
esm: remove support for arrays in import internal method
11a3434 
This avoids initializing arrays that we never use, and simplifies the
implementation overall.

PR-URL: #48296
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Jacob Smith <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
@targos targos mentioned this pull request Jun 5, 2023
Merged
This was referenced Jun 6, 2023
Open
Open
Open
@aduh95 aduh95 mentioned this pull request Jun 11, 2023
Merged
@danielleadams danielleadams added the backport-requested-v18.x PRs awaiting manual backport to the v18.x-staging branch. label Jun 30, 2023
Ceres6 pushed a commit to Ceres6/node that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2023
@aduh95 @Ceres6
esm: remove support for arrays in import internal method
db25dc6 
This avoids initializing arrays that we never use, and simplifies the
implementation overall.

PR-URL: nodejs#48296
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Jacob Smith <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Ceres6 pushed a commit to Ceres6/node that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2023
@aduh95 @Ceres6
esm: remove support for arrays in import internal method
71715e4 
This avoids initializing arrays that we never use, and simplifies the
implementation overall.

PR-URL: nodejs#48296
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Jacob Smith <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
targos pushed a commit to targos/node that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2023
@aduh95 @targos
esm: remove support for arrays in import internal method
96edd85 
This avoids initializing arrays that we never use, and simplifies the
implementation overall.

PR-URL: nodejs#48296
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Jacob Smith <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
@targos targos mentioned this pull request Nov 11, 2023
Closed
@targos targos added backported-to-v18.x PRs backported to the v18.x-staging branch. and removed backport-requested-v18.x PRs awaiting manual backport to the v18.x-staging branch. labels Nov 23, 2023
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 23, 2023
@aduh95 @targos
esm: remove support for arrays in import internal method
1c7be60 
This avoids initializing arrays that we never use, and simplifies the
implementation overall.

PR-URL: #48296
Backport-PR-URL: #50669
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Jacob Smith <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
@targos targos mentioned this pull request Nov 28, 2023
Merged
sercher added a commit to sercher/graaljs that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2024
@sercher
esm: remove support for arrays in import internal method
0fe2237 
This avoids initializing arrays that we never use, and simplifies the
implementation overall.

PR-URL: nodejs/node#48296
Backport-PR-URL: nodejs/node#50669
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Jacob Smith <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
sercher added a commit to sercher/graaljs that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2024
@sercher
esm: remove support for arrays in import internal method
0845e6e 
This avoids initializing arrays that we never use, and simplifies the
implementation overall.

PR-URL: nodejs/node#48296
Backport-PR-URL: nodejs/node#50669
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Jacob Smith <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@JakobJingleheimer JakobJingleheimer JakobJingleheimer approved these changes

@ljharb ljharb ljharb left review comments

@jlenon7 jlenon7 jlenon7 approved these changes

@targos targos targos approved these changes

@benjamingr benjamingr benjamingr approved these changes

@GeoffreyBooth GeoffreyBooth GeoffreyBooth approved these changes

@jasnell jasnell jasnell approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. backported-to-v18.x PRs backported to the v18.x-staging branch. esm Issues and PRs related to the ECMAScript Modules implementation. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. process Issues and PRs related to the process subsystem.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
10 participants
@aduh95 @nodejs-github-bot @ljharb @jasnell @GeoffreyBooth @benjamingr @targos @JakobJingleheimer @jlenon7 @danielleadams