-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
doc: de-emphasize wrapping in napi_define_class #36159
Closed
gabrielschulhof
wants to merge
2
commits into
nodejs:master
from
gabrielschulhof:fix-napi-define-class-doc
Closed
doc: de-emphasize wrapping in napi_define_class #36159
gabrielschulhof
wants to merge
2
commits into
nodejs:master
from
gabrielschulhof:fix-napi-define-class-doc
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Change the documentation for `napi_define_class` in such a way that it mentions wrapping C++ class instances as a possible use for the API, rather than making the assumption that it is the use case for the API. Signed-off-by: Gabriel Schulhof <[email protected]> Fixes: nodejs#36150
Review requested:
|
nodejs-github-bot
added
doc
Issues and PRs related to the documentations.
node-api
Issues and PRs related to the Node-API.
labels
Nov 18, 2020
mhdawson
approved these changes
Nov 18, 2020
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Trott
reviewed
Nov 19, 2020
Trott
reviewed
Nov 19, 2020
Trott
reviewed
Nov 19, 2020
Trott
reviewed
Nov 19, 2020
Trott
approved these changes
Nov 19, 2020
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM with or without the suggestions I've left
Co-authored-by: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
gabrielschulhof
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 20, 2020
Change the documentation for `napi_define_class` in such a way that it mentions wrapping C++ class instances as a possible use for the API, rather than making the assumption that it is the use case for the API. Signed-off-by: Gabriel Schulhof <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Fixes: #36150 PR-URL: #36159 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
Landed in bb3cbba. |
codebytere
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 22, 2020
Change the documentation for `napi_define_class` in such a way that it mentions wrapping C++ class instances as a possible use for the API, rather than making the assumption that it is the use case for the API. Signed-off-by: Gabriel Schulhof <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Fixes: #36150 PR-URL: #36159 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
Merged
BethGriggs
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 10, 2020
Change the documentation for `napi_define_class` in such a way that it mentions wrapping C++ class instances as a possible use for the API, rather than making the assumption that it is the use case for the API. Signed-off-by: Gabriel Schulhof <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Fixes: #36150 PR-URL: #36159 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
BethGriggs
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 10, 2020
Change the documentation for `napi_define_class` in such a way that it mentions wrapping C++ class instances as a possible use for the API, rather than making the assumption that it is the use case for the API. Signed-off-by: Gabriel Schulhof <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Fixes: #36150 PR-URL: #36159 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
Merged
BethGriggs
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 15, 2020
Change the documentation for `napi_define_class` in such a way that it mentions wrapping C++ class instances as a possible use for the API, rather than making the assumption that it is the use case for the API. Signed-off-by: Gabriel Schulhof <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Fixes: #36150 PR-URL: #36159 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Change the documentation for
napi_define_class
in such a way thatit mentions wrapping C++ class instances as a possible use for the API,
rather than making the assumption that it is the use case for the API.
Signed-off-by: @gabrielschulhof
Fixes: #36150
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passes