Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

lib: cosmetic change to builtinLibs list for maintainability #33106

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jasnell
Copy link
Member

@jasnell jasnell commented Apr 27, 2020

This is a largely cosmetic change suggested for easier
maintainability of the builtinLibs list. While the
QUIC PR no longer modifies this list, the original version
of the PR did and the fact that all of the entries were
bundled up into the same lines meant that adding one
forced a larger change to all. With this PR, when we
want to add a new built-in, it won't impact any of the
others.

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

This is a largely cosmetic change suggested for easier
maintainability of the builtinLibs list. While the
QUIC PR no longer modifies this list, the original version
of the PR did and the fact that all of the entries were
bundled up into the same lines meant that adding one
forced a larger change to all. With this PR, when we
want to add a new built-in, it won't impact any of the
others.
@jasnell jasnell requested review from sam-github and addaleax April 27, 2020 20:24
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

nodejs-github-bot commented Apr 27, 2020

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/31023/ (:yellow_heart:)

@jasnell jasnell added author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. lib / src Issues and PRs related to general changes in the lib or src directory. labels Apr 28, 2020
jasnell added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2020
This is a largely cosmetic change suggested for easier
maintainability of the builtinLibs list. While the
QUIC PR no longer modifies this list, the original version
of the PR did and the fact that all of the entries were
bundled up into the same lines meant that adding one
forced a larger change to all. With this PR, when we
want to add a new built-in, it won't impact any of the
others.

PR-URL: #33106
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
@jasnell
Copy link
Member Author

jasnell commented Apr 29, 2020

Landed in 80b9777

@jasnell jasnell closed this Apr 29, 2020
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 4, 2020
This is a largely cosmetic change suggested for easier
maintainability of the builtinLibs list. While the
QUIC PR no longer modifies this list, the original version
of the PR did and the fact that all of the entries were
bundled up into the same lines meant that adding one
forced a larger change to all. With this PR, when we
want to add a new built-in, it won't impact any of the
others.

PR-URL: #33106
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
@targos targos mentioned this pull request May 4, 2020
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 7, 2020
This is a largely cosmetic change suggested for easier
maintainability of the builtinLibs list. While the
QUIC PR no longer modifies this list, the original version
of the PR did and the fact that all of the entries were
bundled up into the same lines meant that adding one
forced a larger change to all. With this PR, when we
want to add a new built-in, it won't impact any of the
others.

PR-URL: #33106
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 13, 2020
This is a largely cosmetic change suggested for easier
maintainability of the builtinLibs list. While the
QUIC PR no longer modifies this list, the original version
of the PR did and the fact that all of the entries were
bundled up into the same lines meant that adding one
forced a larger change to all. With this PR, when we
want to add a new built-in, it won't impact any of the
others.

PR-URL: #33106
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. lib / src Issues and PRs related to general changes in the lib or src directory.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants