-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
stream: fix broken pipeline test #33030
Conversation
An unfortunate overlap between two PR that by themselves pass CI but together pass a test. nodejs#32967 changes so that pipeline does not wait for 'close'. nodejs#32968 changed so that all streams are not destroyed. Which made one test fail when expected the stream to be destroyed during pipeline callback.
@nodejs/streams |
fast track? |
CI is broken right now without this change so assuming it's the right change to make, we should fast-track this. |
I think this PR can land given fast track. However, as I'm unsure I would like to request that a more experienced collaborator lands this as fast tracked. |
@ronag it needs one more +1 to fast track it (it requires 2). |
An unfortunate overlap between two PR that by themselves pass CI but together pass a test. #32967 changes so that pipeline does not wait for 'close'. #32968 changed so that all streams are not destroyed. Which made one test fail when expected the stream to be destroyed during pipeline callback. PR-URL: #33030 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Landed in 3140fdc 🎉 |
An unfortunate overlap between two PR that by themselves pass CI but together pass a test. #32967 changes so that pipeline does not wait for 'close'. #32968 changed so that all streams are not destroyed. Which made one test fail when expected the stream to be destroyed during pipeline callback. PR-URL: #33030 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Should this be backported to v12? It does rely upon other commits that would have to be backported first. |
@BridgeAR don't try to update v12, I have a wip branch that I will push to staging after the release of 12.16.3 today |
@targos I did not plan on doing that, I just wanted to add the label, if applicable. |
An unfortunate overlap between two PR that by themselves pass CI but together pass a test. #32967 changes so that pipeline does not wait for 'close'. #32968 changed so that all streams are not destroyed. Which made one test fail when expected the stream to be destroyed during pipeline callback. PR-URL: #33030 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
An unfortunate overlap between two PR that by themselves pass
CI but together fail a test.
#32967 changes so that pipeline does not wait for 'close' on Duplex streams when only interested in one side.
#32968 changed so that all streams are not destroyed.
Which together made one test fail which expected the stream to be
destroyed before pipeline callback.
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passes