Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: refactor test-worker #32509

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

himself65
Copy link
Member

refactor to same with test-worker.mjs

const TEST_STRING = 'Hello, world!';
if (isMainThread) {
const w = new Worker(new URL(import.meta.url));
w.on('message', mustCall((message) => {
assert.strictEqual(message, TEST_STRING);
}));
} else {
setImmediate(() => {
process.nextTick(() => {
parentPort.postMessage(TEST_STRING);
});
});
}

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the test Issues and PRs related to the tests. label Mar 26, 2020
@himself65 himself65 changed the title test: refactor test-worker.js test: refactor test-worker Mar 28, 2020
@himself65 himself65 force-pushed the 20200327-test-refactor branch from e8d302e to e7d080b Compare March 28, 2020 00:27
@himself65
Copy link
Member Author

I changed to kTestString also in mjs test

@addaleax addaleax added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Apr 2, 2020
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

nodejs-github-bot commented Apr 5, 2020

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/30472/ (:heavy_check_mark:)

@addaleax
Copy link
Member

addaleax commented Apr 5, 2020

Landed in c2aedd0

addaleax pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 5, 2020
PR-URL: #32509
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <[email protected]>
@addaleax addaleax closed this Apr 5, 2020
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2020
PR-URL: #32509
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <[email protected]>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 12, 2020
PR-URL: #32509
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <[email protected]>
@targos targos added backport-blocked-v12.x and removed author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. backport-blocked-v12.x labels Apr 22, 2020
targos pushed a commit to targos/node that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2020
PR-URL: nodejs#32509
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <[email protected]>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2020
PR-URL: #32509
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
test Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants