-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
worker: handle exception when creating execArgv errors #27245
Closed
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Handle possible JS exceptions that can occur by returning to JS land immediately. The motivation for this change is that `USE(….FromJust());` is an anti-pattern, and `.FromJust()` with an unused return value is superseded by `.Check()`. However, in this case, checking that the operation succeeded is not necessary. Refs: nodejs#27162
nodejs-github-bot
added
c++
Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++.
worker
Issues and PRs related to Worker support.
labels
Apr 15, 2019
bnoordhuis
approved these changes
Apr 16, 2019
Local<String> key = | ||
FIXED_ONE_BYTE_STRING(env->isolate(), "invalidExecArgv"); | ||
USE(args.This()->Set(env->context(), key, error).FromJust()); | ||
USE(args.This()->Set(env->context(), key, error)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe add an explaining comment here? I bet it's going to look wrong to the casual reader otherwise.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yup, added a comment!
jasnell
approved these changes
Apr 16, 2019
addaleax
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 17, 2019
Handle possible JS exceptions that can occur by returning to JS land immediately. The motivation for this change is that `USE(….FromJust());` is an anti-pattern, and `.FromJust()` with an unused return value is superseded by `.Check()`. However, in this case, checking that the operation succeeded is not necessary. Refs: #27162 PR-URL: #27245 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Landed in 002dacb |
This was referenced Apr 23, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Handle possible JS exceptions that can occur by returning to JS land
immediately.
The motivation for this change is that
USE(….FromJust());
is ananti-pattern, and
.FromJust()
with an unused return value issuperseded by
.Check()
. However, in this case, checking that theoperation succeeded is not necessary.
Refs: #27162
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passes