-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
worker: refactor thread id management #25796
Conversation
Debug(this, "Set up worker with id %llu", thread_id_); | ||
wrap->Set(env->context(), | ||
env->thread_id_string(), | ||
Number::New(env->isolate(), static_cast<double>(thread_id_))) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Now come to think of it, maybe this should be a BigInt?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@nodejs/workers Thoughts? BigInt seems like it might be a bit much, but since it’s really just an identifier, that might be okay?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That sounds OK to me
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In order to be relevant that'd require spawning more than 9,007,199,254,740,991 threads.
If we can spawn 1000 threads every seconds (a lot) and our program does nothing but spawn threads and we disregard any other limit or cleanup - it would take us ~285,616 years to exhaust that number of threads and overflow.
9007199254740991 / 1000 (threads per second) / 60 (seconds per minute) / 60 (minutes per hour) / 24 (hours per day) / 365 (days per year) = ~285616
If our machine is super fast and we spawn 100,000 threads per second instead, it would still take us over 2000 years. I certainly hope no one is going to run a Node.js server for that long.
I think a double is fine 😅
2235bae
to
adfebcc
Compare
Rebased due to merge conflicts, CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/20418/ |
- Assign thread IDs to `Environment` instances, rather than Workers. This is more embedder-friendly than the current system, in which all “main threads” (if there are multiple ones) would get the id `0`. - Because that means that `isMainThread === (threadId === 0)` no longer holds, refactor `isMainThread` into a separate entity. Implement it in a way that allows for future extensibility, because we use `isMainThread` in multiple different ways (determining whether there is a parent thread; determining whether the current thread has control of the current process; etc.).
adfebcc
to
38f26a3
Compare
Sigh … rebased again. |
- Assign thread IDs to `Environment` instances, rather than Workers. This is more embedder-friendly than the current system, in which all “main threads” (if there are multiple ones) would get the id `0`. - Because that means that `isMainThread === (threadId === 0)` no longer holds, refactor `isMainThread` into a separate entity. Implement it in a way that allows for future extensibility, because we use `isMainThread` in multiple different ways (determining whether there is a parent thread; determining whether the current thread has control of the current process; etc.). PR-URL: #25796 Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <[email protected]>
- Assign thread IDs to `Environment` instances, rather than Workers. This is more embedder-friendly than the current system, in which all “main threads” (if there are multiple ones) would get the id `0`. - Because that means that `isMainThread === (threadId === 0)` no longer holds, refactor `isMainThread` into a separate entity. Implement it in a way that allows for future extensibility, because we use `isMainThread` in multiple different ways (determining whether there is a parent thread; determining whether the current thread has control of the current process; etc.). PR-URL: #25796 Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <[email protected]>
Environment
instances, rather than Workers.This is more embedder-friendly than the current system, in which
all “main threads” (if there are multiple ones) would get the
id
0
.isMainThread === (threadId === 0)
no longerholds, refactor
isMainThread
into a separate entity. Implement itin a way that allows for future extensibility, because we use
isMainThread
in multiple different ways (determining whether thereis a parent thread; determining whether the current thread has control
of the current process; etc.).
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passes